Lithium-ion battery recycling routes: An environmental assessment in the context of the European battery regulation

This study evaluates the environmental impacts of three primary lithium-ion battery (LIB) recycling processes—pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical, and direct recycling—through a life cycle perspective. The analysis considers lithium iron phosphate (LFP), nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC), and nickel-cobalt-aluminium (NCA) cathode chemistries, both individually and as a projected 2031 mixture. Pyrometallurgical recycling exhibits the highest climate change impacts due to CO₂ emissions during high-temperature calcination. In contrast, direct recycling exhibits the lowest environmental impacts across all impact categories assessed. However, its industrial scalability and the effective cathode material separation for mixed input feedstocks remain significant challenges. Hydrometallurgical recycling is heavily influenced by the environmental burdens of input materials, with over 70% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions attributable to reagents like sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide, which also contribute to marine eutrophication and respiratory effects. The graphite produced from the hydrometallurgical process is often incinerated due to its low quality and limited recyclability, which increases net emissions and brings the environmental impacts of hydrometallurgy closer to those of pyrometallurgical methods. Interestingly, although LFP recycling benefits from reduced processing chemical and energy demands, the lower environmental credits associated to the recovered materials result in relatively high net impacts. These findings emphasize the need to consider the full life cycle and especially the environmental value of recovered materials when assessing the environmental sustainability of LIB recycling processes. Future improvements should focus on increasing material recovery rates, minimizing processing emissions and chemicals demand, and incorporating renewable energy to reduce electricity-related impacts. Tailoring recycling technologies to specific chemistries and generating high-resolution data from industrial processes will be essential for optimizing recycling strategies and aligning them with sustainability goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scenv.2025.100306
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lithium-ion battery recycling routes: An environmental assessment in the context of the European battery regulation

Franco Di Persio, Alessandro Agostini, Talita Peixoto
1 citations
Sustainable Chemistry for the Environment
Extraction and Separation Processes
0.71
article

Lithium-ion battery recycling routes: An environmental assessment in the context of the European battery regulation

Franco Di Persio, Alessandro Agostini, Talita Peixoto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental impacts of three primary lithium-ion battery (LIB) recycling processes—pyrometallurgical, hydrometallurgical, and direct recycling—through a life cycle perspective. The analysis considers lithium iron phosphate (LFP), nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC), and nickel-cobalt-aluminium (NCA) cathode chemistries, both individually and as a projected 2031 mixture. Pyrometallurgical recycling exhibits the highest climate change impacts due to CO₂ emissions during high-temperature calcination. In contrast, direct recycling exhibits the lowest environmental impacts across all impact categories assessed. However, its industrial scalability and the effective cathode material separation for mixed input feedstocks remain significant challenges. Hydrometallurgical recycling is heavily influenced by the environmental burdens of input materials, with over 70% of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions attributable to reagents like sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide, which also contribute to marine eutrophication and respiratory effects. The graphite produced from the hydrometallurgical process is often incinerated due to its low quality and limited recyclability, which increases net emissions and brings the environmental impacts of hydrometallurgy closer to those of pyrometallurgical methods. Interestingly, although LFP recycling benefits from reduced processing chemical and energy demands, the lower environmental credits associated to the recovered materials result in relatively high net impacts. These findings emphasize the need to consider the full life cycle and especially the environmental value of recovered materials when assessing the environmental sustainability of LIB recycling processes. Future improvements should focus on increasing material recovery rates, minimizing processing emissions and chemicals demand, and incorporating renewable energy to reduce electricity-related impacts. Tailoring recycling technologies to specific chemistries and generating high-resolution data from industrial processes will be essential for optimizing recycling strategies and aligning them with sustainability goals.

Sustainable Chemistry for the EnvironmentVol. 13
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT), Transport Research Centre (CZ), CIRCE - Centro Tecnológico (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Extraction and Separation Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.