Official defeat of Seafarers’ right to decent working time

Regulation 2.3 of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006) requires States to regulate ‘hours of work or hours of rest’. Listing three non-equivalent workweek standards (48-72-91), the regulation empowers Flag States to select the applicable norms. The study reviews the choices of Flag States when enacting working time standards applicable to their fleet under national law. In the overwhelming majority of cases, States adopt the working standard that is least favourable to workers. The general adoption of standards allowing up to a 91-hour workweek - the European Union Member States not being an exception - suggests a global alignment of regulators with the interests of capital and a disregard for the principles of labour law, which aim to protect the weaker party to the contract, in this case, the seafarer. Such a result indicates a governance imbalance at both international and national levels. Consequently, decent working time principles are disregarded, allowing unsafe and unhealthy working time conditions at sea to persist.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Labour Law Journal
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525251390884
Primary Topic
Maritime Navigation and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Official defeat of Seafarers’ right to decent working time

Laura Carballo Piñeiro, Raphaël Baumler, Bikram Singh Bhatia, María Carrera-Arce
European Labour Law Journal
Maritime Navigation and Safety
article

Official defeat of Seafarers’ right to decent working time

Laura Carballo Piñeiro, Raphaël Baumler, Bikram Singh Bhatia, María Carrera-Arce
article en

Abstract

Regulation 2.3 of the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (MLC, 2006) requires States to regulate ‘hours of work or hours of rest’. Listing three non-equivalent workweek standards (48-72-91), the regulation empowers Flag States to select the applicable norms. The study reviews the choices of Flag States when enacting working time standards applicable to their fleet under national law. In the overwhelming majority of cases, States adopt the working standard that is least favourable to workers. The general adoption of standards allowing up to a 91-hour workweek - the European Union Member States not being an exception - suggests a global alignment of regulators with the interests of capital and a disregard for the principles of labour law, which aim to protect the weaker party to the contract, in this case, the seafarer. Such a result indicates a governance imbalance at both international and national levels. Consequently, decent working time principles are disregarded, allowing unsafe and unhealthy working time conditions at sea to persist.

European Labour Law JournalVol. 17(1)
World Maritime University (SE), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Maritime Navigation and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Official defeat of Seafarers’ right to decent working time — Laura Carballo Piñeiro, Raphaël Baumler, et al. · European Labour Law Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS