Unlocking medical students’ adoption of AIGC tools: a multi-theory perspective

Abstract Artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) is an emerging technology with growing influence across numerous fields, yet factors shaping its sustained adoption—particularly among specialized groups such as medical students—remain poorly understood. This study examines the determinants of medical students’ intention to use AIGC tools, integrating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), Diffusion of Innovations theory, and Perceived Risk theory into a comprehensive framework. Data were collected from 401 medical students and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results indicate that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence are the strongest positive predictors of usage intention, while perceived risk and perceived trust did not show significant effects. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing usability, social support, and integration into educational workflows. The study provides actionable insights for medical educators, technology developers, and policymakers seeking to promote AIGC adoption through tailored training, ethical guidelines, and system improvements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06078-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking medical students’ adoption of AIGC tools: a multi-theory perspective

Huanhuan Qi, Chen Wang, Liping Guo, Huiying Qi et al.
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
article

Unlocking medical students’ adoption of AIGC tools: a multi-theory perspective

Huanhuan Qi, Chen Wang, Liping Guo, Huiying Qi, Z Li, Z. X. Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) is an emerging technology with growing influence across numerous fields, yet factors shaping its sustained adoption—particularly among specialized groups such as medical students—remain poorly understood. This study examines the determinants of medical students’ intention to use AIGC tools, integrating the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), Diffusion of Innovations theory, and Perceived Risk theory into a comprehensive framework. Data were collected from 401 medical students and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The results indicate that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence are the strongest positive predictors of usage intention, while perceived risk and perceived trust did not show significant effects. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing usability, social support, and integration into educational workflows. The study provides actionable insights for medical educators, technology developers, and policymakers seeking to promote AIGC adoption through tailored training, ethical guidelines, and system improvements.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Beijing Language and Culture University (CN), Peking University (CN), Peking University Sixth Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unlocking medical students’ adoption of AIGC tools: a multi-theory perspective — Huanhuan Qi, Chen Wang, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS