Who Cares: Why the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict Matters (More) to Some EU Member States

Abstract What drives the salience of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict amongst EU member states? This article employs domestic foreign policy theories to explain the factors underlying variation in salience, estimated analysing all country statements made at the United Nations General Assembly between 1993 and 2017. Our findings suggest that there is a U‐shaped relationship between government ideology and attention for the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: governments at ideological extremes tend to devote more attention than centrist ones. Moreover, we find that member states with higher trade exposure to the region demonstrate greater attention to the conflict. Additionally, we find that member states with larger Muslim populations tend to attach more salience to the topic. Through the use of such a relevant and divisive case, our study contributes to the understanding of foreign policy co‐operation amongst EU member states and its impact on European integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70058
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Cares: Why the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict Matters (More) to Some EU Member States

Michal Onderčo, Irena Kalhousová, Valerio Vignoli
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Who Cares: Why the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict Matters (More) to Some EU Member States

Michal Onderčo, Irena Kalhousová, Valerio Vignoli
article en

Abstract

Abstract What drives the salience of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict amongst EU member states? This article employs domestic foreign policy theories to explain the factors underlying variation in salience, estimated analysing all country statements made at the United Nations General Assembly between 1993 and 2017. Our findings suggest that there is a U‐shaped relationship between government ideology and attention for the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: governments at ideological extremes tend to devote more attention than centrist ones. Moreover, we find that member states with higher trade exposure to the region demonstrate greater attention to the conflict. Additionally, we find that member states with larger Muslim populations tend to attach more salience to the topic. Through the use of such a relevant and divisive case, our study contributes to the understanding of foreign policy co‐operation amongst EU member states and its impact on European integration.

JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
University of Siena (IT), Charles University (CZ), University for Foreigners of Siena (IT), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, European Commission, European University Institute, Università Bocconi
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.