Typologies of physical education experts’ perspectives on designing physical activity program guidelines for older adults in urban–rural community centers: a Q-methodology study

This study employed Q methodology to identify and categorize the subjective perspectives of physical education experts on developing physical activity program guidelines for older adults in senior community centers situated in South Korea's urban-rural hybrid regions. As health promotion for aging populations becomes increasingly important, existing physical activity programs often lack expert-led design and contextual relevance. To address this issue, 25 Q-statements were refined based on a literature review and focus group interviews. Twenty qualified experts participated in the Q-sorting process, and the data were analyzed using centroid factor extraction and Varimax rotation. The analysis revealed four distinct types: (1) infrastructure-focused planning, (2) psychosocial well-being emphasis, (3) instructor-participant relational focus, and (4) structured and accessible design. While participants' perspectives differed, they consistently emphasized the importance of stress reduction and cognitive engagement across all types. These findings underscore the need for multidimensional, expert-informed, and locally adapted physical activity program guidelines for senior centers, particularly in transitional urban-rural areas. The results offer practical insights for developing evidence-based interventions that support healthy aging and improve the quality of life for older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1675612
Primary Topic
Q Methodology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Typologies of physical education experts’ perspectives on designing physical activity program guidelines for older adults in urban–rural community centers: a Q-methodology study

Heonsu Gwon, Goomyeung Kwon, Wonjae Jeon
Frontiers in Public Health
Q Methodology Applications
article

Typologies of physical education experts’ perspectives on designing physical activity program guidelines for older adults in urban–rural community centers: a Q-methodology study

Heonsu Gwon, Goomyeung Kwon, Wonjae Jeon
article en

Abstract

This study employed Q methodology to identify and categorize the subjective perspectives of physical education experts on developing physical activity program guidelines for older adults in senior community centers situated in South Korea's urban-rural hybrid regions. As health promotion for aging populations becomes increasingly important, existing physical activity programs often lack expert-led design and contextual relevance. To address this issue, 25 Q-statements were refined based on a literature review and focus group interviews. Twenty qualified experts participated in the Q-sorting process, and the data were analyzed using centroid factor extraction and Varimax rotation. The analysis revealed four distinct types: (1) infrastructure-focused planning, (2) psychosocial well-being emphasis, (3) instructor-participant relational focus, and (4) structured and accessible design. While participants' perspectives differed, they consistently emphasized the importance of stress reduction and cognitive engagement across all types. These findings underscore the need for multidimensional, expert-informed, and locally adapted physical activity program guidelines for senior centers, particularly in transitional urban-rural areas. The results offer practical insights for developing evidence-based interventions that support healthy aging and improve the quality of life for older adults.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 13
Daegu Haany University (KR), Korea National University of Education (KR), Yong In University (KR), Daegu University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Q Methodology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.