Investigating the antimethanogenic effects of selected nitro-compounds on methane production, rumen fermentation, and methanogenic archaea <i>in vitro</i>

Enteric methane emissions (EME) cause adverse environmental effects and energy losses to the host. Given the potent antimethanogenic effects of the nitro compounds (NC) ethyl-nitroacetate (ENA), ethyl-2-nitropropionate (ENP), and nitrate (NO₃⁻), we hypothesized that they could effectively mitigate EME. Phase 1 determined dose responses of each NC, identified optimal doses, and evaluated their effects on gaseous composition, rumen fermentation, and bacterial-archaea populations. ENA and ENP tested at 8 and 16 mM inhibited CH<sub>4</sub> production by 100%, whereas NO₃⁻ tested at 12 and 24 mM reduced CH<sub>4</sub> production by 72%. However, the amount of spared H<sub>2</sub> differed among NC, revealing differential effects on fermentation pathways. ENA increased propionate and butyrate concentrations at the expense of acetate, whereas ENP slightly reduced acetate and modestly increased propionate at 24 h post-incubation. NO₃⁻ acted as an alternative H<sub>2</sub> sink without changing fermentation end products. The overall methanogenic community was not altered, but each NC differentially reduced the abundance of <i>Methanobrevibacter ruminantium</i> M1, <i>Methanosphaera stadtmanae</i>, and the methanogenic archaeon ISO4-H5. ENA greatly altered the bacterial profiles, followed by ENP and NO₃⁻. Phase 2 investigated the impact of NC (0-1.25 mM) on <i>M. stadtmanae</i> cultures at 24 and 48 h post-incubation. The findings aligned with phase 1, confirming reduced CH<sub>4</sub> production and H<sub>2</sub> flux dynamics. ENA and ENP inhibited <i>M. stadtmanae</i> growth and CH<sub>4</sub> production at all tested doses, whereas NO₃⁻ was effective at concentrations above 0.75 mM. These results highlight distinct mechanisms for CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation, warranting further studies on additional methanogenic species to refine mitigation strategies.IMPORTANCEEME signify detrimental environmental impacts and constitutes an energy loss for the host. ENA, ENP, and NO₃⁻ showed distinct antimethanogenic effects, resulting in varied impacts on gas composition, rumen fermentation, and bacterial-archaea populations. ENA exerted the strongest and most direct inhibitory effect on methanogenesis, leading to notable changes in H<sub>2</sub> and VFA accumulations and archaeal populations. Although ENP completely inhibited CH<sub>4</sub> production, it resulted in low H<sub>2</sub> accumulations, suggesting an indirect effect and a dose-dependent modulation of fermentation pathways. NO₃⁻ produced a moderate reduction in CH<sub>4</sub> output by diverting H<sub>2</sub> toward NH<sub>3</sub> production while maintaining fermentation stability. <i>M. stadtmanae</i> cultures verified that ENA, ENP, and NO₃⁻ have distinct mechanisms of action, thereby affecting methanogenesis differently. These findings highlight the potential of nitro-compounds for CH<sub>4</sub> reduction, underscoring the need for <i>in vivo</i> validation alongside detailed multi-omics analyses to fully understand their effects on rumen microbiota and metabolic networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01033-25
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating the antimethanogenic effects of selected nitro-compounds on methane production, rumen fermentation, and methanogenic archaea in vitro

Darko Stefanovski, Kapil Singh Narayan, Krishna Challa, Nagaraju Indugu et al.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Investigating the antimethanogenic effects of selected nitro-compounds on methane production, rumen fermentation, and methanogenic archaea in vitro

Darko Stefanovski, Kapil Singh Narayan, Krishna Challa, Nagaraju Indugu, Dipti Pitta, Alexa M. Johnson, Xin Zhao, Alicia Castañeda, Terry Webb
article en

Abstract

Enteric methane emissions (EME) cause adverse environmental effects and energy losses to the host. Given the potent antimethanogenic effects of the nitro compounds (NC) ethyl-nitroacetate (ENA), ethyl-2-nitropropionate (ENP), and nitrate (NO₃⁻), we hypothesized that they could effectively mitigate EME. Phase 1 determined dose responses of each NC, identified optimal doses, and evaluated their effects on gaseous composition, rumen fermentation, and bacterial-archaea populations. ENA and ENP tested at 8 and 16 mM inhibited CH<sub>4</sub> production by 100%, whereas NO₃⁻ tested at 12 and 24 mM reduced CH<sub>4</sub> production by 72%. However, the amount of spared H<sub>2</sub> differed among NC, revealing differential effects on fermentation pathways. ENA increased propionate and butyrate concentrations at the expense of acetate, whereas ENP slightly reduced acetate and modestly increased propionate at 24 h post-incubation. NO₃⁻ acted as an alternative H<sub>2</sub> sink without changing fermentation end products. The overall methanogenic community was not altered, but each NC differentially reduced the abundance of <i>Methanobrevibacter ruminantium</i> M1, <i>Methanosphaera stadtmanae</i>, and the methanogenic archaeon ISO4-H5. ENA greatly altered the bacterial profiles, followed by ENP and NO₃⁻. Phase 2 investigated the impact of NC (0-1.25 mM) on <i>M. stadtmanae</i> cultures at 24 and 48 h post-incubation. The findings aligned with phase 1, confirming reduced CH<sub>4</sub> production and H<sub>2</sub> flux dynamics. ENA and ENP inhibited <i>M. stadtmanae</i> growth and CH<sub>4</sub> production at all tested doses, whereas NO₃⁻ was effective at concentrations above 0.75 mM. These results highlight distinct mechanisms for CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation, warranting further studies on additional methanogenic species to refine mitigation strategies.IMPORTANCEEME signify detrimental environmental impacts and constitutes an energy loss for the host. ENA, ENP, and NO₃⁻ showed distinct antimethanogenic effects, resulting in varied impacts on gas composition, rumen fermentation, and bacterial-archaea populations. ENA exerted the strongest and most direct inhibitory effect on methanogenesis, leading to notable changes in H<sub>2</sub> and VFA accumulations and archaeal populations. Although ENP completely inhibited CH<sub>4</sub> production, it resulted in low H<sub>2</sub> accumulations, suggesting an indirect effect and a dose-dependent modulation of fermentation pathways. NO₃⁻ produced a moderate reduction in CH<sub>4</sub> output by diverting H<sub>2</sub> toward NH<sub>3</sub> production while maintaining fermentation stability. <i>M. stadtmanae</i> cultures verified that ENA, ENP, and NO₃⁻ have distinct mechanisms of action, thereby affecting methanogenesis differently. These findings highlight the potential of nitro-compounds for CH<sub>4</sub> reduction, underscoring the need for <i>in vivo</i> validation alongside detailed multi-omics analyses to fully understand their effects on rumen microbiota and metabolic networks.

Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyVol. 91(12)
McGill University (CA), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.