Spray Deposition, Drift and Equipment Contamination for Drone and Conventional Orchard Spraying Under European Conditions

In Europe, there is a growing interest in crop spraying using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, drones), although current legislation imposes significant limitations on this technique. Spraying of orchard crops with drones remains particularly challenging due to the risks of spray drift and insufficient deposition uniformity. This study evaluated spray deposition within tree canopies (in two application terms), airborne and sediment drift losses, and contamination of the spraying equipment. The performance of a medium-sized drone (ABZ Innovation L10, maximum take-off weight 29 kg) was compared at flight speeds of 1.8, 2.7, and 3.6 m·s−1 with that of a conventional orchard sprayer (Munckhof axial sprayer with column attachment, operating at 1.7 m·s−1). A fluorescent tracer (BF7G, 1200 g·ha−1) was used in all trials, with spray volume rates of 27 or 40 L·ha−1 for the drone and 400 L·ha−1 for the sprayer. In most cases, deposition within the tree canopy was significantly lower for the drone. Poor uniformity of spray distribution was observed, especially between the upper and lower surfaces of collector plates with attached filter papers and between the top and bottom canopy zones. Airborne drift increased significantly with higher drone flight speeds, while sediment drift decreased. At 1.8 m·s−1, both drift types were comparable to those from the conventional sprayer. Drone surface contamination was several times lower than that of the ground sprayer, even when accounting for differences in equipment surface area.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15232467
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spray Deposition, Drift and Equipment Contamination for Drone and Conventional Orchard Spraying Under European Conditions

A. Godyń, W. Świechowski, G. Doruchowski, R. Hołownicki et al.
3 citations
Agriculture
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
5.25
article

Spray Deposition, Drift and Equipment Contamination for Drone and Conventional Orchard Spraying Under European Conditions

A. Godyń, W. Świechowski, G. Doruchowski, R. Hołownicki, Konrad Sas, Andrzej Bartosik
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In Europe, there is a growing interest in crop spraying using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, drones), although current legislation imposes significant limitations on this technique. Spraying of orchard crops with drones remains particularly challenging due to the risks of spray drift and insufficient deposition uniformity. This study evaluated spray deposition within tree canopies (in two application terms), airborne and sediment drift losses, and contamination of the spraying equipment. The performance of a medium-sized drone (ABZ Innovation L10, maximum take-off weight 29 kg) was compared at flight speeds of 1.8, 2.7, and 3.6 m·s−1 with that of a conventional orchard sprayer (Munckhof axial sprayer with column attachment, operating at 1.7 m·s−1). A fluorescent tracer (BF7G, 1200 g·ha−1) was used in all trials, with spray volume rates of 27 or 40 L·ha−1 for the drone and 400 L·ha−1 for the sprayer. In most cases, deposition within the tree canopy was significantly lower for the drone. Poor uniformity of spray distribution was observed, especially between the upper and lower surfaces of collector plates with attached filter papers and between the top and bottom canopy zones. Airborne drift increased significantly with higher drone flight speeds, while sediment drift decreased. At 1.8 m·s−1, both drift types were comparable to those from the conventional sprayer. Drone surface contamination was several times lower than that of the ground sprayer, even when accounting for differences in equipment surface area.

AgricultureVol. 15(23)
State Higher Vocational School in Skierniewice (PL), Instytut Ogrodnictwa – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Plant Surface Properties and Treatments
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.