Complaining in historical Chinese criminal trials

Abstract This study examines late-imperial Chinese criminal trials, starting from the observation that, in historical Chinese criminal trials, the speech act Complain is not only surprisingly frequent but is also often realised by the magistrate conducting the trial. We examine Complains in a corpus drawn from late imperial Chinese gong’an 公案 (literally, ‘criminal case’) novels. Whilst fictive in nature, such novels feature courtroom interactions in a turn-to-turn fashion, imitating spoken language. Gong’an novels are perhaps the best available sources for pragmatic analysis, since in historical China criminal trials were not transcribed. We examined our data through the lens of ritual, a finite typology of speech acts, and an interactional system. Our analysis shows that Complains represent an important part of historical Chinese courtroom investigations because they allowed magistrates to win over the trial’s audience and also to justify their judgments morally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.25012.han
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complaining in historical Chinese criminal trials

Fengguang Liu, Dániel Z. Kádár, Juliane House, Dan Han
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Complaining in historical Chinese criminal trials

Fengguang Liu, Dániel Z. Kádár, Juliane House, Dan Han
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines late-imperial Chinese criminal trials, starting from the observation that, in historical Chinese criminal trials, the speech act Complain is not only surprisingly frequent but is also often realised by the magistrate conducting the trial. We examine Complains in a corpus drawn from late imperial Chinese gong’an 公案 (literally, ‘criminal case’) novels. Whilst fictive in nature, such novels feature courtroom interactions in a turn-to-turn fashion, imitating spoken language. Gong’an novels are perhaps the best available sources for pragmatic analysis, since in historical China criminal trials were not transcribed. We examined our data through the lens of ritual, a finite typology of speech acts, and an interactional system. Our analysis shows that Complains represent an important part of historical Chinese courtroom investigations because they allowed magistrates to win over the trial’s audience and also to justify their judgments morally.

Journal of Historical PragmaticsVol. 26(3)
Center for Applied Linguistics (US), Dalian University of Foreign Languages (CN), Universität Hamburg (DE), King's College London (GB), Hellenic American University (US), University of Maribor (SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complaining in historical Chinese criminal trials — Fengguang Liu, Dániel Z. Kádár, et al. · Journal of Historical Pragmatics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS