Excess of infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the first versus second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with long COVID

Post-COVID-19 condition affects up to 10% of patients months after a COVID-19 episode. Population-based epidemiology suggests that self-reported long COVID in France might be more common among those infected during the first wave of the pandemic than the second one, supporting the role of contextual risk factors in symptom persistence in some patients. We aimed to examine whether this pattern could also be observed in a clinical setting, considering patients with well-characterized post-COVID-19 condition and the general population. In a case-population study, we compared the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first wave (January 1 to May 11, 2020) versus the second wave, which involved the same historical variant (May 12, 2020 to January 15, 2021) between patients with post-COVID-19 condition assessed during a multidisciplinary day-hospital program and the general population. Binary logistic regression was used to compute odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for infection during the first versus the second wave. Among 177 consecutive patients, the odds of reporting SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first versus the second wave were significantly higher than in the Paris area general population (OR [95% CI]: 1.74 [1.27–2.40]), p < 0.001). The results remained similar in sensitivity analyses considering the French general population (1.36 [1.02–1.88]). These results further suggest the role of contextual factors in long COVID and the relevance of a biopsychosocial perspective. - Patients with post-COVID-19 condition were assessed during a multidisciplinary day-hospital program. - Infection was more frequent during first versus second wave compared to the general population. - These results replicate and extend previous findings from a non-clinical population. - Contextual factors may play a role in persistent symptoms after COVID-19.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25417-x
Primary Topic
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Excess of infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the first versus second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with long COVID

Julie Dubois, Olivier Steichen, Emmanuel Lafont, Cédric Lemogne et al.
BMC Public Health
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
article

Excess of infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the first versus second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with long COVID

Julie Dubois, Olivier Steichen, Emmanuel Lafont, Cédric Lemogne, Léa Rotenberg, Clément Gouraud, Victor Pitron, Étienne Canouï, Geoffrey Cheminet, Laurence Slama, Patricia Thoreux, Dominique Batisse, Marc Scherlinger, Prunelle Getten, Alexandra Serris, Marina Karmochkine, Juliette Tennenbaum, Jean‐Benoît Arlet, Perrine Parize, Alexandra Kachaner, Anthony Vanjak, N. Senot, Brigitte Ranque, Martin Belan, Jean Sibilia, Éric Caumes, Anne Pouvaret, Olivier Robineau, Charles Ouazana Vedrines, Sabrina Betouche, Katell Bolloch, Edouard Flammarion, Caroline Pritschkat, Vincent Goyat, Kewei Xiang, Adrien Michon, Corina Manoli, Fabrice Carrat, Juliette Pavie, Jean-Paul Viard, Corentin Verot, Emma Lerondeau
article en

Abstract

Post-COVID-19 condition affects up to 10% of patients months after a COVID-19 episode. Population-based epidemiology suggests that self-reported long COVID in France might be more common among those infected during the first wave of the pandemic than the second one, supporting the role of contextual risk factors in symptom persistence in some patients. We aimed to examine whether this pattern could also be observed in a clinical setting, considering patients with well-characterized post-COVID-19 condition and the general population. In a case-population study, we compared the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first wave (January 1 to May 11, 2020) versus the second wave, which involved the same historical variant (May 12, 2020 to January 15, 2021) between patients with post-COVID-19 condition assessed during a multidisciplinary day-hospital program and the general population. Binary logistic regression was used to compute odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for infection during the first versus the second wave. Among 177 consecutive patients, the odds of reporting SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first versus the second wave were significantly higher than in the Paris area general population (OR [95% CI]: 1.74 [1.27–2.40]), p < 0.001). The results remained similar in sensitivity analyses considering the French general population (1.36 [1.02–1.88]). These results further suggest the role of contextual factors in long COVID and the relevance of a biopsychosocial perspective. - Patients with post-COVID-19 condition were assessed during a multidisciplinary day-hospital program. - Infection was more frequent during first versus second wave compared to the general population. - These results replicate and extend previous findings from a non-clinical population. - Contextual factors may play a role in persistent symptoms after COVID-19.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Université de Lille (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Saint-Antoine (FR), Hôpital Européen (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Tourcoing (FR), Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (FR), Institut Pierre Louis d‘Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (FR), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR), Hôtel-Dieu de Lyon (FR), Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.