Comparative outcomes of ULIF versus OLIF-LP for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an early efficacy study

Both ULIF and OLIF are effective methods for the treatment of DLS. Compared with OLIF, ULIF has a longer operation time, more blood loss, and a higher risk of dural injury, but their clinical effects are comparable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06441-4
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative outcomes of ULIF versus OLIF-LP for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an early efficacy study

Er Wang, Long Wang, Haidong Li, J Y Ming
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Comparative outcomes of ULIF versus OLIF-LP for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an early efficacy study

Er Wang, Long Wang, Haidong Li, J Y Ming
article en

Abstract

Both ULIF and OLIF are effective methods for the treatment of DLS. Compared with OLIF, ULIF has a longer operation time, more blood loss, and a higher risk of dural injury, but their clinical effects are comparable.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and ResearchVol. 20(1)
Huzhou Normal University (CN), Third People's Hospital of Huzhou (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.