DeepCARS-Identified High-Risk Patients: Clinical Interventions and Outcomes During the Korean Healthcare Crisis

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Timely recognition of deteriorating ward patients is critical to prevent adverse outcomes. The Deep learning-based Cardiac Arrest Risk Score (DeepCARS), an AI-based early warning system developed in Korea, has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, but its impact on real-world physician decision-making remains unclear, especially under healthcare resource constraints. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We retrospectively analyzed 830 adult ward patients (March 2024-February 2025) who triggered DeepCARS alerts (score ≥ 91) at a tertiary hospital during a nationwide workforce shortage. Physician responses were classified as active intervention (ICU transfer, life-sustaining treatment [LST] decision, or specialty consultation) versus observation. <i>Results</i>: Among patients with DeepCARS ≥ 91, 58.9% received active intervention, with higher in-hospital mortality compared with those observed only (34.8% vs. 9.7%). ROC analysis suggested a cutoff of ≥94 for better intervention discrimination (AUC = 0.708). In multivariable analysis, DeepCARS ≥ 94 (OR 3.52) and chronic liver disease (OR 1.78) independently predicted active intervention. Multinomial analysis showed that patients admitted to medical departments were more often directed toward LST decisions rather than ICU transfer. Hemato-oncologic comorbidities were associated with both ICU transfer and LST decisions, while elevated respiratory rate consistently predicted either ICU transfer or LST discussions. <i>Conclusions</i>: DeepCARS alerts effectively triggered physician-driven decisions regarding ICU transfer and end-of-life care during a healthcare crisis. However, the ultimate clinical responses were shaped by comprehensive clinical judgment that integrated AI-generated risks with patient-specific factors, such as functional status and frailty, not captured by the algorithm. This underscores the indispensable role of individualized clinical assessment in interpreting and acting upon AI-based alerts in high-risk ward patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61111896
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DeepCARS-Identified High-Risk Patients: Clinical Interventions and Outcomes During the Korean Healthcare Crisis

Kwangha Lee, Won-Seok Yoo, Hyojin Jang, Sora Hwang
Medicina
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

DeepCARS-Identified High-Risk Patients: Clinical Interventions and Outcomes During the Korean Healthcare Crisis

Kwangha Lee, Won-Seok Yoo, Hyojin Jang, Sora Hwang
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Timely recognition of deteriorating ward patients is critical to prevent adverse outcomes. The Deep learning-based Cardiac Arrest Risk Score (DeepCARS), an AI-based early warning system developed in Korea, has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, but its impact on real-world physician decision-making remains unclear, especially under healthcare resource constraints. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: We retrospectively analyzed 830 adult ward patients (March 2024-February 2025) who triggered DeepCARS alerts (score ≥ 91) at a tertiary hospital during a nationwide workforce shortage. Physician responses were classified as active intervention (ICU transfer, life-sustaining treatment [LST] decision, or specialty consultation) versus observation. <i>Results</i>: Among patients with DeepCARS ≥ 91, 58.9% received active intervention, with higher in-hospital mortality compared with those observed only (34.8% vs. 9.7%). ROC analysis suggested a cutoff of ≥94 for better intervention discrimination (AUC = 0.708). In multivariable analysis, DeepCARS ≥ 94 (OR 3.52) and chronic liver disease (OR 1.78) independently predicted active intervention. Multinomial analysis showed that patients admitted to medical departments were more often directed toward LST decisions rather than ICU transfer. Hemato-oncologic comorbidities were associated with both ICU transfer and LST decisions, while elevated respiratory rate consistently predicted either ICU transfer or LST discussions. <i>Conclusions</i>: DeepCARS alerts effectively triggered physician-driven decisions regarding ICU transfer and end-of-life care during a healthcare crisis. However, the ultimate clinical responses were shaped by comprehensive clinical judgment that integrated AI-generated risks with patient-specific factors, such as functional status and frailty, not captured by the algorithm. This underscores the indispensable role of individualized clinical assessment in interpreting and acting upon AI-based alerts in high-risk ward patients.

MedicinaVol. 61(11)
Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.