Binaural audio frontend processing for cochlear implants inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex

Objectives The “MOC strategy” is a binaural audio processing method for cochlear implants (CI) inspired by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex. Although the strategy can improve hearing for CI users, it requires a bilateral channel pairing for the contralateral control of the backend compression and, therefore, the same number of frequency channels and electrodes on both sides. This may limit its clinical applicability. As a step to overcome this difficulty, here, we present and test a version of the MOC strategy designed to operate at the front end (FE) rather than the back end of processing, referred to as the MOC FE . Design The MOC FE strategy was implemented and tested in combination with a pair of functionally independent bilateral MED-EL FS4 audio processors. The hearing of bilateral CI users was compared for the MOC FE as well as for two reference strategies: the standard FS4 strategy and a backend MOC strategy. The MOC FE and MOC strategies were implemented with fast contralateral inhibition. Measures included (1) speech reception thresholds for sentences in fluctuating and stationary noise, in unilateral and bilateral listening modes, and for three different speech levels; and (2) sound source localization in quiet and in noise. Five bilateral users of MED-EL CIs participated in the evaluations. Results (1) For speech intelligibility in fluctuating noise, the MOC FE was as beneficial (re FS4) as the backend MOC strategy, except for one specific spatial configuration (S −60 N 60 ), where the MOC FE produced no benefits while the MOC strategy did. (2) Neither the MOC FE nor the MOC strategies improved intelligibility in a stationary noise, possibly because they involved fast rather than slow contralateral inhibition. (3) The binaural MOC FE and MOC strategies tended to improve sound source localization slightly relative to the FS4 strategy. Conclusion The MOC FE can become a successful alternative to the MOC strategy, as it may be more easily implemented in clinical devices and applied to a broader range of clinical map configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1678288
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Binaural audio frontend processing for cochlear implants inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex

Joshua S. Stohl, Reinhold Schatzer, Christian Rainer Wirtz, Milagros J. Fumero et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

Binaural audio frontend processing for cochlear implants inspired by the medial olivocochlear reflex

Joshua S. Stohl, Reinhold Schatzer, Christian Rainer Wirtz, Milagros J. Fumero, Enrique A. Lopez‐Poveda, Almudena Eustaquio-Martín, Peter Nopp
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives The “MOC strategy” is a binaural audio processing method for cochlear implants (CI) inspired by the medial olivocochlear (MOC) reflex. Although the strategy can improve hearing for CI users, it requires a bilateral channel pairing for the contralateral control of the backend compression and, therefore, the same number of frequency channels and electrodes on both sides. This may limit its clinical applicability. As a step to overcome this difficulty, here, we present and test a version of the MOC strategy designed to operate at the front end (FE) rather than the back end of processing, referred to as the MOC FE . Design The MOC FE strategy was implemented and tested in combination with a pair of functionally independent bilateral MED-EL FS4 audio processors. The hearing of bilateral CI users was compared for the MOC FE as well as for two reference strategies: the standard FS4 strategy and a backend MOC strategy. The MOC FE and MOC strategies were implemented with fast contralateral inhibition. Measures included (1) speech reception thresholds for sentences in fluctuating and stationary noise, in unilateral and bilateral listening modes, and for three different speech levels; and (2) sound source localization in quiet and in noise. Five bilateral users of MED-EL CIs participated in the evaluations. Results (1) For speech intelligibility in fluctuating noise, the MOC FE was as beneficial (re FS4) as the backend MOC strategy, except for one specific spatial configuration (S −60 N 60 ), where the MOC FE produced no benefits while the MOC strategy did. (2) Neither the MOC FE nor the MOC strategies improved intelligibility in a stationary noise, possibly because they involved fast rather than slow contralateral inhibition. (3) The binaural MOC FE and MOC strategies tended to improve sound source localization slightly relative to the FS4 strategy. Conclusion The MOC FE can become a successful alternative to the MOC strategy, as it may be more easily implemented in clinical devices and applied to a broader range of clinical map configurations.

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 19
Semiconductor Research Corporation (US), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Instituto de Estudios de Ciencias de la Salud de Castilla y León (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (ES), MED-EL (Austria) (AT)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Junta de Castilla y León, MED-EL Medical Electronics, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.