AI as a partner in assessment: generating situational judgment tests with large language models

Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are important tools for evaluating individual abilities by presenting specific scenarios and assessing the responses. This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in developing SJTs, with emotional regulation as an example. We proposed and evaluated two approaches using ERNIE 4.0, an advanced Chinese LLM: generating new items from scratch (Approach 1) and adapting items from existing examples (Approach 2). The quality of generated items was assessed through expert evaluations and empirical testing with 93 psychology undergraduates and 184 participants from a general population pool. Results indicate that items generated by ERNIE 4.0, particularly new items from Approach 1, met or exceeded the quality of existing tests in both expert evaluations and empirical validations, while adapted items showed some limitations. This research demonstrates LLMs’ potential for developing valid assessments, offering insights for future applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03613-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Medical Education and Admissions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.76

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI as a partner in assessment: generating situational judgment tests with large language models

Liming Jiang, Fang Luo, Xuetao Tian
2 citations
BMC Psychology
Medical Education and Admissions
3.76
article

AI as a partner in assessment: generating situational judgment tests with large language models

Liming Jiang, Fang Luo, Xuetao Tian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) are important tools for evaluating individual abilities by presenting specific scenarios and assessing the responses. This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in developing SJTs, with emotional regulation as an example. We proposed and evaluated two approaches using ERNIE 4.0, an advanced Chinese LLM: generating new items from scratch (Approach 1) and adapting items from existing examples (Approach 2). The quality of generated items was assessed through expert evaluations and empirical testing with 93 psychology undergraduates and 184 participants from a general population pool. Results indicate that items generated by ERNIE 4.0, particularly new items from Approach 1, met or exceeded the quality of existing tests in both expert evaluations and empirical validations, while adapted items showed some limitations. This research demonstrates LLMs’ potential for developing valid assessments, offering insights for future applications.

BMC PsychologyVol. 13(1)
Beijing Normal University (CN), Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Medical Education and Admissions
3.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI as a partner in assessment: generating situational judgment tests with large language models — Liming Jiang, Fang Luo, et al. · BMC Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS