The Jurisprudence of Functional Identity: Artificial Intelligence as a Combatant in Warfare Under Article 43(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions

Article 43(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions defines combatants but does not specify that they must be human. Bundle Theory, which views identity as a collection of rights and duties, suggests that legal personhood is unnecessary for combatant status. Artificial intelligence, while not a legal person, could meet the functional criteria of a combatant, such as Roe v Wade (1973), where personhood was contextually recognised. Similarly, artificial intelligence could be classified as a combatant under international as participating in hostilities and adhering to a command structure. This parallels Roe v. humanitarian law without being granted full legal personhood.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laws
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14060091
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Jurisprudence of Functional Identity: Artificial Intelligence as a Combatant in Warfare Under Article 43(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions

Johnny Sakr
Laws
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Jurisprudence of Functional Identity: Artificial Intelligence as a Combatant in Warfare Under Article 43(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions

Johnny Sakr
article en

Abstract

Article 43(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions defines combatants but does not specify that they must be human. Bundle Theory, which views identity as a collection of rights and duties, suggests that legal personhood is unnecessary for combatant status. Artificial intelligence, while not a legal person, could meet the functional criteria of a combatant, such as Roe v Wade (1973), where personhood was contextually recognised. Similarly, artificial intelligence could be classified as a combatant under international as participating in hostilities and adhering to a command structure. This parallels Roe v. humanitarian law without being granted full legal personhood.

LawsVol. 14(6)
Prince Sultan University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Jurisprudence of Functional Identity: Artificial Intelligence as a Combatant in Warfare Under Article 43(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions — Johnny Sakr · Laws (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS