The Jurisprudence of Functional Identity: Artificial Intelligence as a Combatant in Warfare Under Article 43(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions
Article 43(2) of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions defines combatants but does not specify that they must be human. Bundle Theory, which views identity as a collection of rights and duties, suggests that legal personhood is unnecessary for combatant status. Artificial intelligence, while not a legal person, could meet the functional criteria of a combatant, such as Roe v Wade (1973), where personhood was contextually recognised. Similarly, artificial intelligence could be classified as a combatant under international as participating in hostilities and adhering to a command structure. This parallels Roe v. humanitarian law without being granted full legal personhood.
Authors
- Johnny Sakr (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0732-6373)
Institutions
- Prince Sultan University (SA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Laws
- Published
- 2025-11-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14060091
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00