On Stacy’s Generalized Gamma Competing Risks Model: Estimation Procedure with Applications to Blood Cancer Data

Competing risks modeling plays a pivotal role in both reliability analysis for scientific and engineering fields and survival analysis within medical research. In real-world scenarios, failure or death (from a biological perspective) often arises from multiple risk factors that compete with one another. To adequately capture these complexities, it is essential to employ a flexible probabilistic framework, such as the competing risks model, which ensures suitability for intricate risk scenarios (e.g., analyzing data from aggressive diseases where treatment response and disease progression are closely interwoven). This study introduces Stacy’s competing risks model, built upon Stacy’s generalized gamma distribution, offering enhanced robustness and flexibility over existing models. The paper first develops the mathematical properties of the proposed model, followed by a detailed exploration of parameter estimation through various estimation methods. A key focus is accurately estimating shape parameters to gain deeper insights into the survival and failure mechanisms associated with the underlying phenomenon. The performance of different estimation approaches is assessed using Monte Carlo simulations, with results indicating that the least square, Cramér–von Mises, Anderson–Darling, right Anderson–Darling, and weighted least square had better performance and stable estimation accuracy compared with maximum likelihood maximum product of spacings methods. The model is applied to two real-world blood cancer datasets to demonstrate practical applicability, showing the superior performance and outstanding fit of the Anderson–Darling method among the other methods. The findings highlight the superior performance of Stacy’s competing risks model, supported by low Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistics and high p-values, affirming its suitability and robustness in modeling blood cancer data compared to other standard models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math13233818
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Stacy’s Generalized Gamma Competing Risks Model: Estimation Procedure with Applications to Blood Cancer Data

Farouq Mohammad A. Alam, Abdulkader Monier Daghistani, Dulayel Almufarrej
Mathematics
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

On Stacy’s Generalized Gamma Competing Risks Model: Estimation Procedure with Applications to Blood Cancer Data

Farouq Mohammad A. Alam, Abdulkader Monier Daghistani, Dulayel Almufarrej
article en

Abstract

Competing risks modeling plays a pivotal role in both reliability analysis for scientific and engineering fields and survival analysis within medical research. In real-world scenarios, failure or death (from a biological perspective) often arises from multiple risk factors that compete with one another. To adequately capture these complexities, it is essential to employ a flexible probabilistic framework, such as the competing risks model, which ensures suitability for intricate risk scenarios (e.g., analyzing data from aggressive diseases where treatment response and disease progression are closely interwoven). This study introduces Stacy’s competing risks model, built upon Stacy’s generalized gamma distribution, offering enhanced robustness and flexibility over existing models. The paper first develops the mathematical properties of the proposed model, followed by a detailed exploration of parameter estimation through various estimation methods. A key focus is accurately estimating shape parameters to gain deeper insights into the survival and failure mechanisms associated with the underlying phenomenon. The performance of different estimation approaches is assessed using Monte Carlo simulations, with results indicating that the least square, Cramér–von Mises, Anderson–Darling, right Anderson–Darling, and weighted least square had better performance and stable estimation accuracy compared with maximum likelihood maximum product of spacings methods. The model is applied to two real-world blood cancer datasets to demonstrate practical applicability, showing the superior performance and outstanding fit of the Anderson–Darling method among the other methods. The findings highlight the superior performance of Stacy’s competing risks model, supported by low Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistics and high p-values, affirming its suitability and robustness in modeling blood cancer data compared to other standard models.

MathematicsVol. 13(23)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Majmaah University (SA)
King Abdulaziz University
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.