Exhaled breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detection methods: GC-MS versus eNose in COPD diagnosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study revealed that VOCs can distinguish COPD patients from healthy controls. While both GC-MS and eNose demonstrated comparable sensitivity, GC-MS - considered the gold standard method for VOCs detection - showed lower specificity and AUC values than eNose in differentiating COPD patients from controls, suggesting that eNose has a lower misdiagnosis rate for COPD. These result may be influenced by the heterogeneity due to the variations in COPD disease stages or differences in breath portion across studies. Future research is recommended to standardize case inclusion criteria and conduct multicenter head-to-head validation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-04040-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exhaled breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detection methods: GC-MS versus eNose in COPD diagnosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhonghua Jiang, Yingying Chai, Yaoxi Chen, Zhixin Qiu et al.
1 citations
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
0.67
article

Exhaled breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detection methods: GC-MS versus eNose in COPD diagnosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhonghua Jiang, Yingying Chai, Yaoxi Chen, Zhixin Qiu, Yang He
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study revealed that VOCs can distinguish COPD patients from healthy controls. While both GC-MS and eNose demonstrated comparable sensitivity, GC-MS - considered the gold standard method for VOCs detection - showed lower specificity and AUC values than eNose in differentiating COPD patients from controls, suggesting that eNose has a lower misdiagnosis rate for COPD. These result may be influenced by the heterogeneity due to the variations in COPD disease stages or differences in breath portion across studies. Future research is recommended to standardize case inclusion criteria and conduct multicenter head-to-head validation studies.

BMC Pulmonary MedicineVol. 26(1)
Sichuan University (CN), West China Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Exhaled breath volatile organic compounds (VOCs) detection methods: GC-MS versus eNose in COPD diagnosis-a systematic review and meta-analysis — Zhonghua Jiang, Yingying Chai, et al. · BMC Pulmonary Medicine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS