The Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle, a Global Glut of Savings, and Omitted Variable Bias: 1970–2023

Feldstein and Horioka in 1980 estimated (I/GDP)i = α + β(S/GDP)i where “i” is for a given country over time, “I” is domestic investment, and “S” is domestic savings. Feldstein and Horioka found βs that were insignificantly different from one and significantly different from zero. According to Feldstein and Horioka, these results conflict with an assumption of perfect capital mobility because, if capital were perfectly mobile, then β should be zero. We estimated (I/GDP)it = α + β(S/GDP)it using data from 22 countries from 1970 to 2023, where i denotes the country and t denotes the year. We found βs to be significantly less than 1 but greater than 0. We then used Reiterative Truncated Projected Least Squares, which was designed to solve the omitted variable problem (and helps a researcher visualize the effects of heteroscedasticity), to estimate a βit for every observation. We find that βit decreases for countries that export capital and increases for countries that import capital. We argue that the Feldstein-Horioka “puzzle” is based on a confusion—when the effect of both exporting and importing capital is considered, β should equal approximately one. Feldstein and Horioka focus on single countries, but when pairs of savings exporters and importers are considered, their “puzzle” disappears. However, the fact that βit is now much less than 1 and falling over time suggests that a global glut of savings is worsening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18120676
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Technological Innovation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle, a Global Glut of Savings, and Omitted Variable Bias: 1970–2023

Jonathan E. Leightner, A.S.K. Sinha
1 citations
Journal of risk and financial management
Economic and Technological Innovation
3.13
article

The Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle, a Global Glut of Savings, and Omitted Variable Bias: 1970–2023

Jonathan E. Leightner, A.S.K. Sinha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Feldstein and Horioka in 1980 estimated (I/GDP)i = α + β(S/GDP)i where “i” is for a given country over time, “I” is domestic investment, and “S” is domestic savings. Feldstein and Horioka found βs that were insignificantly different from one and significantly different from zero. According to Feldstein and Horioka, these results conflict with an assumption of perfect capital mobility because, if capital were perfectly mobile, then β should be zero. We estimated (I/GDP)it = α + β(S/GDP)it using data from 22 countries from 1970 to 2023, where i denotes the country and t denotes the year. We found βs to be significantly less than 1 but greater than 0. We then used Reiterative Truncated Projected Least Squares, which was designed to solve the omitted variable problem (and helps a researcher visualize the effects of heteroscedasticity), to estimate a βit for every observation. We find that βit decreases for countries that export capital and increases for countries that import capital. We argue that the Feldstein-Horioka “puzzle” is based on a confusion—when the effect of both exporting and importing capital is considered, β should equal approximately one. Feldstein and Horioka focus on single countries, but when pairs of savings exporters and importers are considered, their “puzzle” disappears. However, the fact that βit is now much less than 1 and falling over time suggests that a global glut of savings is worsening.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 18(12)
Augusta University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Economic and Technological Innovation
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.