Ideology and policy design after Brexit: explaining the UK subsidy regime

Although states rarely regulate their own domestic subsidies, the UK Government after Brexit set up a UK-wide subsidy control regime. In force from early 2023, the UK Subsidy Control Act replaced the EU state aid rules that had been revoked by the UK Government in late 2020. While the obligation to address the regulation of subsidies was in the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement, the UK Government chose to go beyond these international obligations. This article explains why. It argues that the UK Government’s decision was ideological, that is, it was driven by political ideas about sovereignty and unionism, ideas associated with a form of contemporary conservatism in the UK. This finding is significant as it sheds light on the importance of ideology in UK post-Brexit policy design, whilst also indicating how trade agreements might prompt the emergence of domestic subsidy control regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
West European Politics
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2025.2585439
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ideology and policy design after Brexit: explaining the UK subsidy regime

Michelle Cini, Mike Bolt, Nieves Pérez‐Solórzano Borragán
West European Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Ideology and policy design after Brexit: explaining the UK subsidy regime

Michelle Cini, Mike Bolt, Nieves Pérez‐Solórzano Borragán
article en

Abstract

Although states rarely regulate their own domestic subsidies, the UK Government after Brexit set up a UK-wide subsidy control regime. In force from early 2023, the UK Subsidy Control Act replaced the EU state aid rules that had been revoked by the UK Government in late 2020. While the obligation to address the regulation of subsidies was in the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement, the UK Government chose to go beyond these international obligations. This article explains why. It argues that the UK Government’s decision was ideological, that is, it was driven by political ideas about sovereignty and unionism, ideas associated with a form of contemporary conservatism in the UK. This finding is significant as it sheds light on the importance of ideology in UK post-Brexit policy design, whilst also indicating how trade agreements might prompt the emergence of domestic subsidy control regimes.

West European Politics
University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.