Exploring the predictive performance of deep learning for fracturing fluid flowback and shale gas production

The big data system has been developed to optimally combine numerical-model predictions with actual measurements from the gas shale play to create the best estimates of current shale gas conditions and their uncertainties, improving our ability to forecast and understand the shale gas production variations. However, considering the hydraulic fracturing fluid flowback in predicting shale gas production introduces new challenges. For example, complexities in the flow of gas-water two-phase fluid defy traditional numerical simulation, while flowback are complicated by strong environmental disruptions, and shale gas production encounters substantial noise interference. Here, we developed CNN-Transformer, a production and fluid flowback predicted system using deep learning, by integrating a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a Transformer network. CNN's receptive field focus irregular observational data on the local region correlation of the sequence, while Transformer network extracts the state information of historical production and flowback volumes from previous time frames, and predicts future time states, aiming to capture temporal patterns. We contrast the performance of CNN-Transformer, CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU-AM models in predicting shale gas production, flowback volume and the relationship between the two. We show that the CNN-Transformer outperforms the other models, with R²=0.644 and RMSE = 0.1424, compared to CNN-GRU-AM (R²=0.6068, RMSE = 0.1513) and CNN-LSTM (R²=0.5727, RMSE = 0.1618) in predicting flowback volume. We conclude that CNN-Transformer (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72, RMSE = 0.3824) markedly reduces analysis error of the shale gas production, outperforming both CNN-LSTM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.4911, RMSE = 0.44912) and CNN-GRU-AM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.5705, RMSE = 0.4249). We deem our results to lay a foundation for further debates on striking a balance between fracturing fluid flowback volume and prediction of shale gas production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26761-z
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the predictive performance of deep learning for fracturing fluid flowback and shale gas production

Lisha Peng, Zhensheng Shi, Jian Sun, Yuanjiang Yu et al.
Scientific Reports
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
article

Exploring the predictive performance of deep learning for fracturing fluid flowback and shale gas production

Lisha Peng, Zhensheng Shi, Jian Sun, Yuanjiang Yu, Zhaoyuan Shao, Lei Zhang, Wenhua Bai, Tianqi Zhou, Shasha Sun
article en

Abstract

The big data system has been developed to optimally combine numerical-model predictions with actual measurements from the gas shale play to create the best estimates of current shale gas conditions and their uncertainties, improving our ability to forecast and understand the shale gas production variations. However, considering the hydraulic fracturing fluid flowback in predicting shale gas production introduces new challenges. For example, complexities in the flow of gas-water two-phase fluid defy traditional numerical simulation, while flowback are complicated by strong environmental disruptions, and shale gas production encounters substantial noise interference. Here, we developed CNN-Transformer, a production and fluid flowback predicted system using deep learning, by integrating a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a Transformer network. CNN's receptive field focus irregular observational data on the local region correlation of the sequence, while Transformer network extracts the state information of historical production and flowback volumes from previous time frames, and predicts future time states, aiming to capture temporal patterns. We contrast the performance of CNN-Transformer, CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU-AM models in predicting shale gas production, flowback volume and the relationship between the two. We show that the CNN-Transformer outperforms the other models, with R²=0.644 and RMSE = 0.1424, compared to CNN-GRU-AM (R²=0.6068, RMSE = 0.1513) and CNN-LSTM (R²=0.5727, RMSE = 0.1618) in predicting flowback volume. We conclude that CNN-Transformer (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.72, RMSE = 0.3824) markedly reduces analysis error of the shale gas production, outperforming both CNN-LSTM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.4911, RMSE = 0.44912) and CNN-GRU-AM (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.5705, RMSE = 0.4249). We deem our results to lay a foundation for further debates on striking a balance between fracturing fluid flowback volume and prediction of shale gas production.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development (CN), Oil and Gas Center (CN)
National Science and Technology Major Project, Nature
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.