Digitalised government in the Anthropocene: legal and extra-legal norms

The use of semi-automated and fully automated administrative decision-making systems may challenge legal compliance in a deep sense. While some legal requirements are widely known and relatively straightforward to implement in automated systems, deeper-lying legal principles and values may pose bigger challenges. This is especially the case when individuals with professional qualifications outside the legal field significantly influence the implementation of such systems. On the other hand, such involvement may increase the impact of extra-legal norms originating from other professions. Combining doctrinal analysis and qualitative analyses of authorities’ practices and underlying considerations, we map out how different types of legal phenomena and extra-legal norms influence the implementation of semi-automated and fully automated administrative decision-making systems in this way. Next, we extrapolate the results of this enquiry to predict how different legal phenomena and extra-legal norms will influence authorities’ implementation of automated systems in the context of the screening process of environmental impact assessments (EIA).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Innovation and Technology
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2025.2593769
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digitalised government in the Anthropocene: legal and extra-legal norms

Søren Stig Andersen, Ulrik B. U. Roehl
Law Innovation and Technology
Environmental law and policy
article

Digitalised government in the Anthropocene: legal and extra-legal norms

Søren Stig Andersen, Ulrik B. U. Roehl
article en

Abstract

The use of semi-automated and fully automated administrative decision-making systems may challenge legal compliance in a deep sense. While some legal requirements are widely known and relatively straightforward to implement in automated systems, deeper-lying legal principles and values may pose bigger challenges. This is especially the case when individuals with professional qualifications outside the legal field significantly influence the implementation of such systems. On the other hand, such involvement may increase the impact of extra-legal norms originating from other professions. Combining doctrinal analysis and qualitative analyses of authorities’ practices and underlying considerations, we map out how different types of legal phenomena and extra-legal norms influence the implementation of semi-automated and fully automated administrative decision-making systems in this way. Next, we extrapolate the results of this enquiry to predict how different legal phenomena and extra-legal norms will influence authorities’ implementation of automated systems in the context of the screening process of environmental impact assessments (EIA).

Law Innovation and Technology
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.