Early intervention for psychiatry itself: the invisible hands for future psychiatry

This narrative review probes the future trends of psychiatry from the perspectives of professionals working in the field of early intervention for psychosis and youth mental health. The review is co-constructed by a diverse group of clinicians and researchers, including those with lived experience, working in high- to low-resource settings in the Asia-Pacific. Grounded in the consideration of psychiatry <i>as a medical discipline.</i> When the early intervention lens is applied to the state of psychiatry itself, several 'at-risk' factors have been observed: dilution of the doctor-patient relationship, lack of a robust integrated model of the human person and psychopathology, increased commercialisation, excessive reliance on other professionals, disconnection of knowledge generation and transmission, and tension between the healing and public safety roles of psychiatry. The complexity of mental illness, coupled with high stigma and low resources (even in relatively affluent populations), continues to undermine the proper functioning of psychiatry as a medical speciality. These challenges are likely to intensify in the future. Psychiatry as a profession needs to consolidate a robustly integrated medical approach to mental illness that resists splitting into 'biomedical' and 'psychosocial' perspectives, in the form of a biopsychosocially-informed medical psychotherapeutic practice. It will need to work with other stakeholders in the broader landscape of public mental health without diluting the healing roles in treating mental disorders. Behind a number of recent changes, the 'invisible hand' of the market economy is potentially driving psychiatry towards more inequity and escalating costs. Some of these have been fuelled by decreased effectiveness of the conventional academic platform and the rise of new information platforms that are increasingly challenging to manage. A thoughtful, prudent, and coordinated approach by the profession is essential in ensuring a healthy trajectory for the future of mental health care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Psychiatry
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2025.2564155
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early intervention for psychiatry itself: the invisible hands for future psychiatry

Pavithra Arunachaleeswaran, Vijaya Raghavan, Padmavati Ramachandran, Eóin Killackey et al.
International Review of Psychiatry
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

Early intervention for psychiatry itself: the invisible hands for future psychiatry

Pavithra Arunachaleeswaran, Vijaya Raghavan, Padmavati Ramachandran, Eóin Killackey, William G. Honer, Sherry Kit Wa Chan, Scott Richard Clark, Christy Lai Ming Hui, Barnaby Nelson, Caroline X. Gao, Patrick D. McGorry, Stephanie Ming Yin Wong, Alan J. Thompson, Yi Nam Suen, Arvind Rajagopalan, Yanhui Li, Jimmy Lee, Eric Yu Hai Chen, Oliver Schubert, Bonnie H. Y. Yim
article en

Abstract

This narrative review probes the future trends of psychiatry from the perspectives of professionals working in the field of early intervention for psychosis and youth mental health. The review is co-constructed by a diverse group of clinicians and researchers, including those with lived experience, working in high- to low-resource settings in the Asia-Pacific. Grounded in the consideration of psychiatry <i>as a medical discipline.</i> When the early intervention lens is applied to the state of psychiatry itself, several 'at-risk' factors have been observed: dilution of the doctor-patient relationship, lack of a robust integrated model of the human person and psychopathology, increased commercialisation, excessive reliance on other professionals, disconnection of knowledge generation and transmission, and tension between the healing and public safety roles of psychiatry. The complexity of mental illness, coupled with high stigma and low resources (even in relatively affluent populations), continues to undermine the proper functioning of psychiatry as a medical speciality. These challenges are likely to intensify in the future. Psychiatry as a profession needs to consolidate a robustly integrated medical approach to mental illness that resists splitting into 'biomedical' and 'psychosocial' perspectives, in the form of a biopsychosocially-informed medical psychotherapeutic practice. It will need to work with other stakeholders in the broader landscape of public mental health without diluting the healing roles in treating mental disorders. Behind a number of recent changes, the 'invisible hand' of the market economy is potentially driving psychiatry towards more inequity and escalating costs. Some of these have been fuelled by decreased effectiveness of the conventional academic platform and the rise of new information platforms that are increasingly challenging to manage. A thoughtful, prudent, and coordinated approach by the profession is essential in ensuring a healthy trajectory for the future of mental health care.

International Review of Psychiatry
Schizophrenia Research Foundation (IN), University of British Columbia (CA), The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), Changi General Hospital (SG), Institute of Mental Health (SG), The University of Adelaide (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.