Language machines: Toward a linguistic anthropology of large language models

Abstract Large language models (LLMs) challenge long‐standing assumptions in linguistics and linguistic anthropology by generating human‐like language without relying on rule‐based structures. This introduction to the special issue Language Machines calls for renewed engagement with LLMs as socially embedded language technologies. We trace the intellectual genealogy that led linguistic anthropology to sideline such technologies, highlighting how disciplinary boundaries and language ideologies shaped this absence. Arguing for the field's unique potential to analyze the semiotic, interactional, and ideological dimensions of LLMs, we invite future contributions that expand linguistic anthropology's scope and relevance in the age of machine‐mediated communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.70033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language and cultural evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Language machines: Toward a linguistic anthropology of large language models

Anna Weichselbraun, Michael Castelle, Siri Lamoureaux
1 citations
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
Language and cultural evolution
16.49
article

Language machines: Toward a linguistic anthropology of large language models

Anna Weichselbraun, Michael Castelle, Siri Lamoureaux
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Large language models (LLMs) challenge long‐standing assumptions in linguistics and linguistic anthropology by generating human‐like language without relying on rule‐based structures. This introduction to the special issue Language Machines calls for renewed engagement with LLMs as socially embedded language technologies. We trace the intellectual genealogy that led linguistic anthropology to sideline such technologies, highlighting how disciplinary boundaries and language ideologies shaped this absence. Arguing for the field's unique potential to analyze the semiotic, interactional, and ideological dimensions of LLMs, we invite future contributions that expand linguistic anthropology's scope and relevance in the age of machine‐mediated communication.

Journal of Linguistic AnthropologyVol. 36(1)
University of Vienna (AT), University of Warwick (GB), École de management de Lyon (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Language and cultural evolution
16.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.