Artificial Intelligence and Understanding in Medicine

The paper explores the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine through a three-dimensional model of medical understanding, which encompasses understanding of disease (via the biomedical perspective), illness (through first-person experience) and sickness (which is seen as a social role). By linking these dimensions to the epistemic aims of transparency, certainty and empathy, the analysis highlights how AI's potential to enhance and undermine medical understanding can be debated. While AI may increase the transparency of bodily processes, improve diagnostic certainty and challenge dominant paradigms of clinical empathy, it also threatens to obscure value-laden aspects of illness, erode confidence in subjective and social experiences of sickness and complicate mutual understanding in clinical encounters. Rather than offering an exhaustive empirical analysis of AI applications, this paper provides a conceptual framework for assessing AI's epistemic impacts in medicine, thereby serving as a foundation for future studies to examine specific implementations of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioethics
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70049
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence and Understanding in Medicine

Jonathan Adams
Bioethics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence and Understanding in Medicine

Jonathan Adams
article en

Abstract

The paper explores the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine through a three-dimensional model of medical understanding, which encompasses understanding of disease (via the biomedical perspective), illness (through first-person experience) and sickness (which is seen as a social role). By linking these dimensions to the epistemic aims of transparency, certainty and empathy, the analysis highlights how AI's potential to enhance and undermine medical understanding can be debated. While AI may increase the transparency of bodily processes, improve diagnostic certainty and challenge dominant paradigms of clinical empathy, it also threatens to obscure value-laden aspects of illness, erode confidence in subjective and social experiences of sickness and complicate mutual understanding in clinical encounters. Rather than offering an exhaustive empirical analysis of AI applications, this paper provides a conceptual framework for assessing AI's epistemic impacts in medicine, thereby serving as a foundation for future studies to examine specific implementations of AI.

Bioethics
University of Oslo (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence and Understanding in Medicine — Jonathan Adams · Bioethics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS