Not So Simple! Primitive Concepts and the Threat of Spinozism in the Pre-Critical Kant

Abstract Kant’s precritical possibility proof for the existence of God is often thought to have Spinozistic implications. One important reason for this is that Kant’s reasoning in the Beweisgrund appears to entail that God is extended or spatial. Kant argues that God exemplifies all primitive predicates. Since he also treats extension as such a primitive predicate, it seems to straightforwardly follow that God is extended. This paper argues that Kant’s argument in the Beweisgrund does not, in fact, lead to this Spinozistic conclusion. Importantly, Kant distinguishes between concepts that are primitive for us and concepts that are primitive in themselves. This distinction equips Kant with the resources to block the Spinozistic conclusion that God is extended: he can accept that extension is a primitive concept for us and at the same time reject that extension is a concept primitive in itself, and thus exemplified by God.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Analysis
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anaf098
Primary Topic
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not So Simple! Primitive Concepts and the Threat of Spinozism in the Pre-Critical Kant

Sebastian Bender
Analysis
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
article

Not So Simple! Primitive Concepts and the Threat of Spinozism in the Pre-Critical Kant

Sebastian Bender
article en

Abstract

Abstract Kant’s precritical possibility proof for the existence of God is often thought to have Spinozistic implications. One important reason for this is that Kant’s reasoning in the Beweisgrund appears to entail that God is extended or spatial. Kant argues that God exemplifies all primitive predicates. Since he also treats extension as such a primitive predicate, it seems to straightforwardly follow that God is extended. This paper argues that Kant’s argument in the Beweisgrund does not, in fact, lead to this Spinozistic conclusion. Importantly, Kant distinguishes between concepts that are primitive for us and concepts that are primitive in themselves. This distinction equips Kant with the resources to block the Spinozistic conclusion that God is extended: he can accept that extension is a primitive concept for us and at the same time reject that extension is a concept primitive in itself, and thus exemplified by God.

Analysis
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Not So Simple! Primitive Concepts and the Threat of Spinozism in the Pre-Critical Kant — Sebastian Bender · Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS