Discriminative Cut-Offs, Concurrent Criterion Validity, and Test–Retest Reliability of the Oxford Vaccine Hesitancy Scale
The OVHS demonstrates good-to-excellent discrimination for historical COVID-19 vaccine refusal and strong temporal stability. We found a single, transparent, and transportable operational cut-off (≥35). Our cut-off derivation framework is scale- and endpoint-agnostic and may generalize to other hesitancy instruments and decision cut-offs more broadly.
Authors
- Michael Morrison (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6870-6673)
- Samantha Vanderslott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8685-7758)
- Robert Carlisle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4508-4802)
- Jonathan Kantor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-3014)
Institutions
- Oxford Research Group (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Science Oxford (GB)
- Oxford Technologies (United Kingdom) (GB)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Vaccines
- Published
- 2025-11-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13121200
- Primary Topic
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00