Correction of Refraction Effects on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Structure-from-Motion Bathymetric Survey for Coral Reef Roughness Characterisation

Coral reefs play a crucial role in tropical coastal ecosystems, even though these environments are difficult to monitor due to their diversity and morphological complexity and due to their shallowness in some cases. This study used two approaches for acquiring very-high-resolution bathymetric data: underwater structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry collected from a low-cost platform and unmanned/uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV)-based SfM photogrammetry. While underwater photogrammetry avoids the distortions caused by refraction at air/water interface, it remains limited in spatial coverage (about 0.04 ha in 1 h of survey). In contrast, UAV photogrammetry allows for covering extensive areas (more than 20 ha/h) but requires applying refraction correction in order to accurately compute bathymetry and roughness values. An analytical approach based on Snell laws and an empirical approach based on linear regression (calibrated using a batch of points whose depths are representative of the depth range of the surveyed areas) are tested to correct the apparent depth on the raw UAV digital elevation model (DEM). Comparison to underwater photogrammetry shows that correcting refraction reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) by more than 50% (up to 62%) on bathymetric models, with RMSE lower than 0.13 m for the analytical approach and down to 0.09 m for the regression method. The linear-regression-based refraction correction proved most effective in restoring accurate seabed roughness, with a mean error on roughness lower than 17% (vs. 30% for analytical refraction correction and 48% for apparent bathymetry).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17233846
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction of Refraction Effects on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Structure-from-Motion Bathymetric Survey for Coral Reef Roughness Characterisation

Emmanuel Cordier, France Floc’h, Kévin Martins, Emmanuel Augereau et al.
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Correction of Refraction Effects on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Structure-from-Motion Bathymetric Survey for Coral Reef Roughness Characterisation

Emmanuel Cordier, France Floc’h, Kévin Martins, Emmanuel Augereau, Marion Jaud, Stéphane Bertin, Y. Benoît, Mila Geindre
article en

Abstract

Coral reefs play a crucial role in tropical coastal ecosystems, even though these environments are difficult to monitor due to their diversity and morphological complexity and due to their shallowness in some cases. This study used two approaches for acquiring very-high-resolution bathymetric data: underwater structure-from-motion (SfM) photogrammetry collected from a low-cost platform and unmanned/uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV)-based SfM photogrammetry. While underwater photogrammetry avoids the distortions caused by refraction at air/water interface, it remains limited in spatial coverage (about 0.04 ha in 1 h of survey). In contrast, UAV photogrammetry allows for covering extensive areas (more than 20 ha/h) but requires applying refraction correction in order to accurately compute bathymetry and roughness values. An analytical approach based on Snell laws and an empirical approach based on linear regression (calibrated using a batch of points whose depths are representative of the depth range of the surveyed areas) are tested to correct the apparent depth on the raw UAV digital elevation model (DEM). Comparison to underwater photogrammetry shows that correcting refraction reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) by more than 50% (up to 62%) on bathymetric models, with RMSE lower than 0.13 m for the analytical approach and down to 0.09 m for the regression method. The linear-regression-based refraction correction proved most effective in restoring accurate seabed roughness, with a mean error on roughness lower than 17% (vs. 30% for analytical refraction correction and 48% for apparent bathymetry).

Remote SensingVol. 17(23)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Ifremer (FR), Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR), Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Environnement Marin (FR), Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de la Réunion (RE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Geo-Ocean (FR), La Rochelle Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.