Greenhouse Climate Control at the Food–Water–Energy Nexus: An Analytic Hierarchy Process–Model Predictive Control (AHP–MPC) Approach

The authors frame greenhouse operation as a Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) challenge involving multiple interdependent targets: air temperature and humidity, CO2 enrichment, photoperiod-constrained lighting, and irrigation under dynamic and limited energy availability. We propose a knowledge-driven, multi-objective Model Predictive Controller whose cost function integrates expert priorities elicited via an online Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) survey; these AHP-derived weights parameterize the controller’s objectives and are solved over two 72 h seasonal episodes, so the MPC can anticipate renewable availability and coordinate HVAC, (de)humidification, CO2 dosing, LED lighting, and irrigation alongside dispatch from photovoltaic and wind sources, battery storage, and the grid. By embedding the physical interdependence of climate variables directly into the decision layer, the controller schedules energy-intensive actions around renewable peaks and avoids counterproductive actuator conflicts. Seasonal case studies (summer/high solar and winter/low solar) demonstrate robust performance: temperature tracking errors of SMAPE 2.25%/3.05% and CO2 SMAPE 3.72–3.92%; humidity control with SMAPE 7.04–8.56%; lighting and irrigation following setpoints with low NRMSE (0.08–0.14). Summer energy was 59% renewable; winter was only 13%, increasing grid reliance to 77.5% (peaks: 4.57 kW/6.92 kW for 197.7/181.5 kWh). Under water or energy scarcity, the controller degrades gracefully, protecting high-priority agronomic variables while allowing bounded relaxation on lower-priority targets. This expert-informed, predictive, and resource-aware orchestration offers a scalable route to precision greenhouse control within the food–water–energy nexus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18236219
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greenhouse Climate Control at the Food–Water–Energy Nexus: An Analytic Hierarchy Process–Model Predictive Control (AHP–MPC) Approach

Aouatif Saad, Abderrahim Bajit, Rachid El Bouayadi, Ibtissam El Aouni et al.
1 citations
Energies
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
1.75
article

Greenhouse Climate Control at the Food–Water–Energy Nexus: An Analytic Hierarchy Process–Model Predictive Control (AHP–MPC) Approach

Aouatif Saad, Abderrahim Bajit, Rachid El Bouayadi, Ibtissam El Aouni, hicham Labrim, Driss Zejli, Hamza Benzzine
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The authors frame greenhouse operation as a Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) challenge involving multiple interdependent targets: air temperature and humidity, CO2 enrichment, photoperiod-constrained lighting, and irrigation under dynamic and limited energy availability. We propose a knowledge-driven, multi-objective Model Predictive Controller whose cost function integrates expert priorities elicited via an online Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) survey; these AHP-derived weights parameterize the controller’s objectives and are solved over two 72 h seasonal episodes, so the MPC can anticipate renewable availability and coordinate HVAC, (de)humidification, CO2 dosing, LED lighting, and irrigation alongside dispatch from photovoltaic and wind sources, battery storage, and the grid. By embedding the physical interdependence of climate variables directly into the decision layer, the controller schedules energy-intensive actions around renewable peaks and avoids counterproductive actuator conflicts. Seasonal case studies (summer/high solar and winter/low solar) demonstrate robust performance: temperature tracking errors of SMAPE 2.25%/3.05% and CO2 SMAPE 3.72–3.92%; humidity control with SMAPE 7.04–8.56%; lighting and irrigation following setpoints with low NRMSE (0.08–0.14). Summer energy was 59% renewable; winter was only 13%, increasing grid reliance to 77.5% (peaks: 4.57 kW/6.92 kW for 197.7/181.5 kWh). Under water or energy scarcity, the controller degrades gracefully, protecting high-priority agronomic variables while allowing bounded relaxation on lower-priority targets. This expert-informed, predictive, and resource-aware orchestration offers a scalable route to precision greenhouse control within the food–water–energy nexus.

EnergiesVol. 18(23)
Université Ibn-Tofail (MA)
Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique, Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique, Fondation OCP
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.