Neutralizing antibody responses to the primary series of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in the cancer cohort under active treatment

Individuals with cancer are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may be compromised, especially in those receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment. Understanding how treatment affects vaccine-induced humoral responses is critical to optimize vaccination strategies in this vulnerable population. This study evaluated neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer cohorts undergoing active treatment or not, measured at multiple timepoints before and after vaccination using a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay. We observed significantly lower seroconversion rates and impaired neutralizing antibody responses in the cancer cohort on active treatment compared to those not on treatment, suggesting an association between active treatment and a compromised functional immune response. Although strong correlations between anti-spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies were observed across all groups, regression analyses revealed potential differences in the relationship between binding and functional antibodies. We also observed the correlation between avidity and neutralizing antibodies varied across groups. These findings suggest that active systemic therapy impaired both the quantity and quality of antibody responses. Tailored vaccination timing and monitoring may be critical in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 symptoms and improving COVID-19 vaccine efficacy in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2025.2589647
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neutralizing antibody responses to the primary series of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in the cancer cohort under active treatment

Chris Labaki, Melissa E. Hughes, Rachel Trowbridge, Huijing Xue et al.
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

Neutralizing antibody responses to the primary series of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in the cancer cohort under active treatment

Chris Labaki, Melissa E. Hughes, Rachel Trowbridge, Huijing Xue, Ziad Bakouny, Troy J. Kemp, Nancy U. Lin, Toni K. Choueiri, Nancy Roche, Lígia A. Pinto, Chenglei Li, G. M. Lee, Sarah Strauss
article en

Abstract

Individuals with cancer are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines may be compromised, especially in those receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment. Understanding how treatment affects vaccine-induced humoral responses is critical to optimize vaccination strategies in this vulnerable population. This study evaluated neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer cohorts undergoing active treatment or not, measured at multiple timepoints before and after vaccination using a pseudovirus-based neutralization assay. We observed significantly lower seroconversion rates and impaired neutralizing antibody responses in the cancer cohort on active treatment compared to those not on treatment, suggesting an association between active treatment and a compromised functional immune response. Although strong correlations between anti-spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies were observed across all groups, regression analyses revealed potential differences in the relationship between binding and functional antibodies. We also observed the correlation between avidity and neutralizing antibodies varied across groups. These findings suggest that active systemic therapy impaired both the quantity and quality of antibody responses. Tailored vaccination timing and monitoring may be critical in reducing the risk of severe COVID-19 symptoms and improving COVID-19 vaccine efficacy in this population.

Human Vaccines & ImmunotherapeuticsVol. 21(1)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.