Advancing the science of consciousness: From ethics to clinical care

Significant advances in the scientific investigation of the neurobiology of consciousness have been slow to be translated into clinical settings, limited by a lack of generally agreed working definition (e.g., what is consciousness?) and methodology (e.g., how to identify reliable biomarkers/indicators of consciousness? How to improve sensitivity and specificity of the technological identification of consciousness?). In the present paper we aim at proposing potential strategies for reducing the gap between research, clinical practice, and patients' and their caregivers' needs regarding disorders of consciousness. By implementing a multidisciplinary (i.e., involving different disciplines) and multiperspective (i.e., involving different stakeholders) approach, the paper focuses on disorders of consciousness: it starts from the review of some of the most promising measures of consciousness from brain activity (i.e., electrophysiology and spectral measures, measures of functional connectivity, complexity-based measures). Next the paper introduces brain responses to illusions as a possible new indicator of consciousness (i.e., a feature that facilitates the attribution of consciousness), and illustrates a possible clinical operationalization of the indicators of consciousness through the case of virtual reality. Finally, the paper analyses a set of urgent ethical issues and describes a model for assessing and dealing with those issues, concluding by elaborating key recommendations for improving the clinical treatment of patients with disorders of consciousness through a better translation of research into clinics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106497
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing the science of consciousness: From ethics to clinical care

Kathinka Evers, Benedetta Cecconi, Lars Muckli, Jennifer L. Goldman et al.
1 citations
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
1.35
article

Advancing the science of consciousness: From ethics to clinical care

Kathinka Evers, Benedetta Cecconi, Lars Muckli, Jennifer L. Goldman, María V. Sánchez-Vives, Olivia Gosseries, Steven Laureys, Marcello Massimini, Andrea Pigorini, Gorka Zamora‐López, Gustavo Deco, Cyriel M. A. Pennartz, Alessandra Camassa, Rajanikant Panda, Michele Farisco, Véronique Blandin, Jitka Annen, Vanessa Charland, Arnau Manasanch Berengué, Melody Torao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Significant advances in the scientific investigation of the neurobiology of consciousness have been slow to be translated into clinical settings, limited by a lack of generally agreed working definition (e.g., what is consciousness?) and methodology (e.g., how to identify reliable biomarkers/indicators of consciousness? How to improve sensitivity and specificity of the technological identification of consciousness?). In the present paper we aim at proposing potential strategies for reducing the gap between research, clinical practice, and patients' and their caregivers' needs regarding disorders of consciousness. By implementing a multidisciplinary (i.e., involving different disciplines) and multiperspective (i.e., involving different stakeholders) approach, the paper focuses on disorders of consciousness: it starts from the review of some of the most promising measures of consciousness from brain activity (i.e., electrophysiology and spectral measures, measures of functional connectivity, complexity-based measures). Next the paper introduces brain responses to illusions as a possible new indicator of consciousness (i.e., a feature that facilitates the attribution of consciousness), and illustrates a possible clinical operationalization of the indicators of consciousness through the case of virtual reality. Finally, the paper analyses a set of urgent ethical issues and describes a model for assessing and dealing with those issues, concluding by elaborating key recommendations for improving the clinical treatment of patients with disorders of consciousness through a better translation of research into clinics.

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral ReviewsVol. 180
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Uppsala University (SE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL), University of Liège (BE), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of Milan (IT), Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Ghent University Hospital (BE), ME Association (GB), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Ghent University (BE), Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay (FR), Luigi Sacco Hospital (IT), Biogem (IT), Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation (IT), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), University of Glasgow (GB), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.