Was the KORUS FTA a Horrible Deal?

Abstract Donald Trump argued that the Korea–U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) was a “horrible deal,” pointing to a substantial increase in the U.S. trade deficit with Korea following the agreement’s implementation in March 2012. Notably, during the same period, the U.S. trade balance with numerous other major trading partners, none of which maintained an FTA with the United States, also deteriorated, raising doubts as to whether the KORUS FTA was the primary cause of the observed imbalance. This study evaluates the causal effect of the KORUS FTA on the U.S.–Korea trade balance using a difference-in-differences framework, complemented by event-study and synthetic control analyses as robustness checks. The empirical findings, after accounting for business cycle fluctuations, provide overall support for Trump’s assertion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Economies Review
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-025-09844-2
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Was the KORUS FTA a Horrible Deal?

Peng Shao, Hyeongwoo Kim, Divya Sadana, Jie Zhang et al.
Open Economies Review
Global trade and economics
article

Was the KORUS FTA a Horrible Deal?

Peng Shao, Hyeongwoo Kim, Divya Sadana, Jie Zhang, Madeline H. Kim
article en

Abstract

Abstract Donald Trump argued that the Korea–U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) was a “horrible deal,” pointing to a substantial increase in the U.S. trade deficit with Korea following the agreement’s implementation in March 2012. Notably, during the same period, the U.S. trade balance with numerous other major trading partners, none of which maintained an FTA with the United States, also deteriorated, raising doubts as to whether the KORUS FTA was the primary cause of the observed imbalance. This study evaluates the causal effect of the KORUS FTA on the U.S.–Korea trade balance using a difference-in-differences framework, complemented by event-study and synthetic control analyses as robustness checks. The empirical findings, after accounting for business cycle fluctuations, provide overall support for Trump’s assertion.

Open Economies Review
University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire (US), Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory (US), Navy League of the United States (US), Hunan University of Finance and Economics (CN), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Was the KORUS FTA a Horrible Deal? — Peng Shao, Hyeongwoo Kim, et al. · Open Economies Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS