M-DODII: Bayesian dose optimization design for randomized phase II study with multiple indications

The landscape of oncology drug development is transitioning from traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs to novel agents, such as molecularly targeted therapies (MTA) or immunotherapies. Conventional dose optimization methods based on chemotherapy that assume a monotone dose-response relationship might not be ideal for the development of these novel therapies. Recognizing these limitations, the US FDA has introduced Project Optimus, an initiative aimed to reform the current paradigm of dose optimization. In addition to dose optimization, another critical objective for early phase proof-of-concept clinical trials is indication selection. However, there are limited methodologies that can address dose optimization and indication selection simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian Dose Optimization Design for Randomized Phase II trials with Multiple Indications (M-DODII) that integrates Bayesian continuous monitoring and Bayesian pick-the-winner approach, utilizing efficacy and toxicity endpoints to inform dose selection for multiple indications simultaneously. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that M-DODII has favorable operating characteristics with controlled selection error. Compared to other adaptive designs, M-DODII shows a lower probability of choosing a suboptimal dose, a higher probability of selecting the optimal dose, and reduced total sample size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2025.2589731
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

M-DODII: Bayesian dose optimization design for randomized phase II study with multiple indications

Jianchang Lin, Sasha Kravets, Rachael Liu, Ziji Yu
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

M-DODII: Bayesian dose optimization design for randomized phase II study with multiple indications

Jianchang Lin, Sasha Kravets, Rachael Liu, Ziji Yu
article en

Abstract

The landscape of oncology drug development is transitioning from traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs to novel agents, such as molecularly targeted therapies (MTA) or immunotherapies. Conventional dose optimization methods based on chemotherapy that assume a monotone dose-response relationship might not be ideal for the development of these novel therapies. Recognizing these limitations, the US FDA has introduced Project Optimus, an initiative aimed to reform the current paradigm of dose optimization. In addition to dose optimization, another critical objective for early phase proof-of-concept clinical trials is indication selection. However, there are limited methodologies that can address dose optimization and indication selection simultaneously. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian Dose Optimization Design for Randomized Phase II trials with Multiple Indications (M-DODII) that integrates Bayesian continuous monitoring and Bayesian pick-the-winner approach, utilizing efficacy and toxicity endpoints to inform dose selection for multiple indications simultaneously. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that M-DODII has favorable operating characteristics with controlled selection error. Compared to other adaptive designs, M-DODII shows a lower probability of choosing a suboptimal dose, a higher probability of selecting the optimal dose, and reduced total sample size.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Eli Lilly (United States) (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Takeda (United States) (US), Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.