Three Lenses on China's Information-Age Dilemma

Abstract I examine Fiona Cunningham's Under the Nuclear Shadow: China's Information-Age Weapons in International Security. The central puzzle of Cunningham's excellent book is how China responded to the 1995–1996 Third Taiwan Crisis by developing offensive cyber operations, counterspace capabilities, and precision conventional missiles. Cunningham argues that these capabilities served as China's answer to what she calls its “limited-war dilemma”—enabling it to credibly engage in a conflict below the nuclear threshold in which its conventional capabilities lagged the United States. I examine Cunningham's argument through three analytical lenses: the theorist, the China watcher, and the policymaker. I show the value of her theory and its applicability to a range of theoretical debates, such as around cyber coercion. I praise the depth and breadth of her research, which offers significant insight into the Chinese military and leadership. I argue that the book is naturally constrained by sourcing in its implications for policymakers, but there is, nonetheless, substantial value. Although the book's comprehensive approach may be daunting for those readers who prefer a more narrow frame, it is a remarkable accomplishment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Quarterly
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqaf131
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three Lenses on China's Information-Age Dilemma

Ben Buchanan
Political Science Quarterly
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

Three Lenses on China's Information-Age Dilemma

Ben Buchanan
article en

Abstract

Abstract I examine Fiona Cunningham's Under the Nuclear Shadow: China's Information-Age Weapons in International Security. The central puzzle of Cunningham's excellent book is how China responded to the 1995–1996 Third Taiwan Crisis by developing offensive cyber operations, counterspace capabilities, and precision conventional missiles. Cunningham argues that these capabilities served as China's answer to what she calls its “limited-war dilemma”—enabling it to credibly engage in a conflict below the nuclear threshold in which its conventional capabilities lagged the United States. I examine Cunningham's argument through three analytical lenses: the theorist, the China watcher, and the policymaker. I show the value of her theory and its applicability to a range of theoretical debates, such as around cyber coercion. I praise the depth and breadth of her research, which offers significant insight into the Chinese military and leadership. I argue that the book is naturally constrained by sourcing in its implications for policymakers, but there is, nonetheless, substantial value. Although the book's comprehensive approach may be daunting for those readers who prefer a more narrow frame, it is a remarkable accomplishment.

Political Science Quarterly
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.