Machine‐Learning‐Enabled Structural Design and Optimization of Methanol Reforming Hydrogen Reactors

Abstract A methanol steam reforming and combustion channel reactor was developed to supply hydrogen for high‐power fuel cells. Numerical simulation combined with a backpropagation (BP) neural network, whose maximum error is below 5 %, quantified how channel dimensions and inlet flows influence peak temperature difference, flow maldistribution, methanol conversion, and hydrogen output. Multi‐objective optimization using non‐dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA–II) yielded the optimal layout: length 284 mm, width 171 mm, combustor inlet flow 8.3 × 10 3 mL min −1 , and reformer inlet flow 4.7 × 10 4 mL min −1 . Compared with the initial design, the optimized reactor reduces peak temperature and flow differences by 6.6 % and increases methanol conversion and hydrogen production by about 7 %, meeting the hydrogen demand of roughly 23 kW fuel cells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.70050
Primary Topic
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine‐Learning‐Enabled Structural Design and Optimization of Methanol Reforming Hydrogen Reactors

Weitao Wu, Miao Qian, Zhong Xiang, Yuzhen Xu et al.
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
article

Machine‐Learning‐Enabled Structural Design and Optimization of Methanol Reforming Hydrogen Reactors

Weitao Wu, Miao Qian, Zhong Xiang, Yuzhen Xu, Zhenhao Dong, L. D. Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract A methanol steam reforming and combustion channel reactor was developed to supply hydrogen for high‐power fuel cells. Numerical simulation combined with a backpropagation (BP) neural network, whose maximum error is below 5 %, quantified how channel dimensions and inlet flows influence peak temperature difference, flow maldistribution, methanol conversion, and hydrogen output. Multi‐objective optimization using non‐dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA–II) yielded the optimal layout: length 284 mm, width 171 mm, combustor inlet flow 8.3 × 10 3 mL min −1 , and reformer inlet flow 4.7 × 10 4 mL min −1 . Compared with the initial design, the optimized reactor reduces peak temperature and flow differences by 6.6 % and increases methanol conversion and hydrogen production by about 7 %, meeting the hydrogen demand of roughly 23 kW fuel cells.

Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (CN), Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Catalysts for Methane Reforming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.