Characterisation of resident-to-resident aggression in residential services for people with disabilities

Purpose Resident-to-resident aggression (RRA) is defined as “negative and aggressive physical, sexual or verbal interactions between long-term care residents that in a community setting would likely be construed as unwelcome and have high potential to cause physical or psychological distress in the recipient” (Rosen et al., 2008). Although a commonly occurring phenomena, there is limited research on RRA particularly in residential services for people with disabilities (RCF-D), knowledge which would inform targeted safeguarding action. This study aims to identify the major forms of RRA that are found in RCF-D. Design/methodology/approach Analysis was performed on notifications of allegations of abuse submitted to the Regulator of social services in Ireland, from RCF-D. The authors extracted one year of notifications of abuse made by RCF-D (n = 696) from a large, national database of all notifications made in Ireland. The authors used a hybrid inductive-abductive approach and performed thematic content analysis using an existing framework by Pillemer et al. (2012), originally designed to characterise RRA in nursing homes. Findings Analysis of the notification events identified 17 forms of RRA. The most prevalent forms of RRA were physical bodily aggression (31.6%), general verbal abuse (21.0%) and angry attempts at social control (10.9%). In total, 35.6% of events involved two or more forms of RRA. The findings were used to develop an adapted framework for categorising forms of RRA in RCF-D. Research limitations/implications This study offers a novel insight into RRA events occurring in RCF-D, encompassing a wide range of behaviours, with physical bodily aggression being the most prevalent. Practical implications The adapted framework will inform practice and training programmes; it will also support data collection and future research. Originality/value This study found that RRA events in RCF-Ds in Ireland encompass a wide range of behaviours, the majority of which did not match any of the categories already defined in a framework for nursing homes. This study produced an adapted framework for RCF-Ds to categorise and measure the frequency of RRA. Use of this adapted framework will support practice development and research in this understudied area, and will inform safeguarding policy and practice within services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Adult Protection
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jap-05-2025-0021
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterisation of resident-to-resident aggression in residential services for people with disabilities

Laura M. Keyes, Laura Behan, Paul Dunbar, Mrithunjay Vimalan
The Journal of Adult Protection
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Characterisation of resident-to-resident aggression in residential services for people with disabilities

Laura M. Keyes, Laura Behan, Paul Dunbar, Mrithunjay Vimalan
article en

Abstract

Purpose Resident-to-resident aggression (RRA) is defined as “negative and aggressive physical, sexual or verbal interactions between long-term care residents that in a community setting would likely be construed as unwelcome and have high potential to cause physical or psychological distress in the recipient” (Rosen et al., 2008). Although a commonly occurring phenomena, there is limited research on RRA particularly in residential services for people with disabilities (RCF-D), knowledge which would inform targeted safeguarding action. This study aims to identify the major forms of RRA that are found in RCF-D. Design/methodology/approach Analysis was performed on notifications of allegations of abuse submitted to the Regulator of social services in Ireland, from RCF-D. The authors extracted one year of notifications of abuse made by RCF-D (n = 696) from a large, national database of all notifications made in Ireland. The authors used a hybrid inductive-abductive approach and performed thematic content analysis using an existing framework by Pillemer et al. (2012), originally designed to characterise RRA in nursing homes. Findings Analysis of the notification events identified 17 forms of RRA. The most prevalent forms of RRA were physical bodily aggression (31.6%), general verbal abuse (21.0%) and angry attempts at social control (10.9%). In total, 35.6% of events involved two or more forms of RRA. The findings were used to develop an adapted framework for categorising forms of RRA in RCF-D. Research limitations/implications This study offers a novel insight into RRA events occurring in RCF-D, encompassing a wide range of behaviours, with physical bodily aggression being the most prevalent. Practical implications The adapted framework will inform practice and training programmes; it will also support data collection and future research. Originality/value This study found that RRA events in RCF-Ds in Ireland encompass a wide range of behaviours, the majority of which did not match any of the categories already defined in a framework for nursing homes. This study produced an adapted framework for RCF-Ds to categorise and measure the frequency of RRA. Use of this adapted framework will support practice development and research in this understudied area, and will inform safeguarding policy and practice within services.

The Journal of Adult ProtectionVol. 28(1)
University College Dublin (IE), University of Limerick (IE), Health and Safety Authority (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.