A national randomized field experiment testing the impact of simulated usage-based insurance programs on driver safety

Many motor vehicle crashes are due to risky driving behaviors measurable by smartphone telematics applications. These apps are deployed by usage-based insurance (UBI) programs to estimate crash risk and price policies, incentivizing customers to drive safer. A preregistered randomized controlled trial (NCT06101251) tested whether a simulated UBI program improved driver safety, and whether being assigned or choosing focused goals yielded further improvement. Adult drivers (n = 1,449) were recruited nationally with social media advertisements. After a 6-week baseline period, participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups for a 12-week intervention: 1) Observation (control); 2) Standard Feedback (weekly texts about four risky behaviors, $100 incentive); 3) Assigned Goal (weekly texts about algorithmically assigned focus behavior and goal, $100 incentive); 4) Chosen Goal (weekly texts about self-chosen focus behavior and goal, $100 incentive). Post-intervention, participants were monitored for 6 more weeks. The primary outcome was a 0-100 score for overall safety (100 = safest). Standard Feedback (covariate-adjusted difference, 2.0 [95 % CI, 1.2-2.7]; P < 0.001), Assigned Goal (2.7 [95 % CI, 2.0-3.5]; P < 0.001), and Chosen Goal (2.2 [95 % CI, 1.4-3.0]; P < 0.001) had higher safety scores than control during the intervention period and at follow-up. Differences between treatment groups were not significant after adjusting for number of comparisons, Ps > 0.10. Treatment groups had significant relative reductions in speeding (11 %-13 %, depending on group), hard braking (16 %-21 %), and rapid acceleration (16 %-25 %), Ps < 0.01. The kind of feedback and incentives offered by UBI programs can cause sustained improvements in driver safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Published
2025-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2025.108331
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A national randomized field experiment testing the impact of simulated usage-based insurance programs on driver safety

Dina Abdel-Rahman, Arjun Patel, M. Kit Delgado, Ruiying Xiong et al.
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

A national randomized field experiment testing the impact of simulated usage-based insurance programs on driver safety

Dina Abdel-Rahman, Arjun Patel, M. Kit Delgado, Ruiying Xiong, Brian C. Tefft, Sadie Friday, Malcolm Irving, Athena Lee, William J. Horrey, Catherine C. McDonald, Jeffrey P. Ebert, Subhash Aryal, Michael O. Harhay, Neda Khan
article en

Abstract

Many motor vehicle crashes are due to risky driving behaviors measurable by smartphone telematics applications. These apps are deployed by usage-based insurance (UBI) programs to estimate crash risk and price policies, incentivizing customers to drive safer. A preregistered randomized controlled trial (NCT06101251) tested whether a simulated UBI program improved driver safety, and whether being assigned or choosing focused goals yielded further improvement. Adult drivers (n = 1,449) were recruited nationally with social media advertisements. After a 6-week baseline period, participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups for a 12-week intervention: 1) Observation (control); 2) Standard Feedback (weekly texts about four risky behaviors, $100 incentive); 3) Assigned Goal (weekly texts about algorithmically assigned focus behavior and goal, $100 incentive); 4) Chosen Goal (weekly texts about self-chosen focus behavior and goal, $100 incentive). Post-intervention, participants were monitored for 6 more weeks. The primary outcome was a 0-100 score for overall safety (100 = safest). Standard Feedback (covariate-adjusted difference, 2.0 [95 % CI, 1.2-2.7]; P < 0.001), Assigned Goal (2.7 [95 % CI, 2.0-3.5]; P < 0.001), and Chosen Goal (2.2 [95 % CI, 1.4-3.0]; P < 0.001) had higher safety scores than control during the intervention period and at follow-up. Differences between treatment groups were not significant after adjusting for number of comparisons, Ps > 0.10. Treatment groups had significant relative reductions in speeding (11 %-13 %, depending on group), hard braking (16 %-21 %), and rapid acceleration (16 %-25 %), Ps < 0.01. The kind of feedback and incentives offered by UBI programs can cause sustained improvements in driver safety.

Accident Analysis & PreventionVol. 225
AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety (US), University of Pennsylvania (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.