Beyond Exceptional and Ordinary: Analysing the Effects of Emergency Frames on EU Renewable Energy Policy‐Making

Abstract This study aims to provide a better understanding of how policy‐making changes when an issue is framed as an emergency. Literature on emergency politics provides different views on policy‐making changes resulting from emergency frames, where ordinary and exceptional policy‐making overlap in different ways. This article therefore develops a four‐part framework conceptualising and operationalising the potential policy‐making changes resulting from emergency frames. It develops propositions of changes in the policy‐making process, its output and the governance of the policy issue. It subsequently probes the applicability of the conceptual framework, studying the reframing of renewable energy as a security issue after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. We argue that our conceptual framework helps to explain the varied effects of emergency frames on policy‐making and conditions underlying those effects. Our plausibility probe provides a basis for future research, which could compare other cases or study in depth the discursive component of emergency politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70060
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Exceptional and Ordinary: Analysing the Effects of Emergency Frames on EU Renewable Energy Policy‐Making

Emma Leenders, Duncan Liefferink, Ellen Mastenbroek, Sandrino Smeets
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

Beyond Exceptional and Ordinary: Analysing the Effects of Emergency Frames on EU Renewable Energy Policy‐Making

Emma Leenders, Duncan Liefferink, Ellen Mastenbroek, Sandrino Smeets
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to provide a better understanding of how policy‐making changes when an issue is framed as an emergency. Literature on emergency politics provides different views on policy‐making changes resulting from emergency frames, where ordinary and exceptional policy‐making overlap in different ways. This article therefore develops a four‐part framework conceptualising and operationalising the potential policy‐making changes resulting from emergency frames. It develops propositions of changes in the policy‐making process, its output and the governance of the policy issue. It subsequently probes the applicability of the conceptual framework, studying the reframing of renewable energy as a security issue after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. We argue that our conceptual framework helps to explain the varied effects of emergency frames on policy‐making and conditions underlying those effects. Our plausibility probe provides a basis for future research, which could compare other cases or study in depth the discursive component of emergency politics.

JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.