Crisis All Around? Crisification of the EU Institutional Discourse: A Longitudinal Perspective (2012–2024)

Abstract The increasing frequency and complexity of crises have contributed to the crisification of EU policy‐making and governance. Despite its far‐reaching implications, the discursive dimension of this process remains seriously under‐researched. This article addresses that gap by developing a novel conceptual framework for analysing discursive crisification across five dimensions and applying it to a unique longitudinal study of EU institutional discourse. Using a multi‐method approach combining discourse network analysis and content analysis, the study examines a large dataset of tweets from six key EU institutions over an extensive 2012–2024 period. The findings reveal that whilst the breadth of crisified issues has remained stable, the emergence of new crises, the pre‐emptive framing of potential crises and the articulation of interconnected crises have intensified in recent years. This shift towards a permanently crisis‐aware EU reflects an evolving governance mode that reinforces crisis‐driven policy‐making, with significant implications for EU legitimacy and public perceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70049
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis All Around? Crisification of the EU Institutional Discourse: A Longitudinal Perspective (2012–2024)

Monika Brusenbauch Meislová, Karolína Garančovská
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Crisis All Around? Crisification of the EU Institutional Discourse: A Longitudinal Perspective (2012–2024)

Monika Brusenbauch Meislová, Karolína Garančovská
article en

Abstract

Abstract The increasing frequency and complexity of crises have contributed to the crisification of EU policy‐making and governance. Despite its far‐reaching implications, the discursive dimension of this process remains seriously under‐researched. This article addresses that gap by developing a novel conceptual framework for analysing discursive crisification across five dimensions and applying it to a unique longitudinal study of EU institutional discourse. Using a multi‐method approach combining discourse network analysis and content analysis, the study examines a large dataset of tweets from six key EU institutions over an extensive 2012–2024 period. The findings reveal that whilst the breadth of crisified issues has remained stable, the emergence of new crises, the pre‐emptive framing of potential crises and the articulation of interconnected crises have intensified in recent years. This shift towards a permanently crisis‐aware EU reflects an evolving governance mode that reinforces crisis‐driven policy‐making, with significant implications for EU legitimacy and public perceptions.

JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Aston University (GB), Masaryk University (CZ)
Queen Mary University of London, University of Oxford, European Commission, Masarykova Univerzita, Division of Human Resource Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.