Community acceptance of nature‐based solutions for coastal flood risk management

Abstract Coastal areas are increasingly vulnerable to climate change impacts, such as rising sea levels and more frequent storm events, necessitating urgent adaptation strategies. Various adaptation approaches exist, including hard engineering solutions and nature‐based solutions, but whether these strategies are implemented often depends on social acceptance by local communities. Understanding the factors that influence community acceptance, such as trust, knowledge and perceived effectiveness, is vital for coastal risk management. This study employed a mixed methods approach across four diverse case study sites in the United Kingdom—St Andrews (Scotland), Airth (Scotland), Hesketh Bank (England) and Pensarn (Wales). We employed a postal survey and focus groups to gather both quantitative and qualitative data, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of local perceptions and values. A total of 328 valid responses were gathered across four sites, with variations in response rates and demographic characteristics, notably age and education. Awareness of Nature‐based Solutions (NbS) was low in Hesketh Bank, Pensarn and Airth, only respondents in St Andrews were more familiar with the term. Qualitative analysis identified 68 community and individual‐level factors, scheme characteristics and sociopolitical factors that influence social acceptance of coastal flood risk schemes. Participants emphasised the importance of local knowledge and landscape values but expressed low trust in government authorities and a lack of confidence in influencing local decisions. The study highlights the complexity of community acceptance of NbS for coastal flood risk management, indicating that local perceptions are influenced by a combination individual factors such as trust; the characteristics of schemes; and the ways in which governance systems interact with local communities. Context is also important with certain factors being site specific. Synthesis and applications . Community acceptance plays a crucial role in implementing coastal schemes, highlighting the importance of addressing the interests, values and experiences of local communities. Building trust and engaging stakeholders early in the planning stages to overcome potential push back due to uncertainties is critical. Collaborative and whole‐systems approaches are also essential to ensure that the benefits of NbS are effectively communicated and integrated. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70182
Primary Topic
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community acceptance of nature‐based solutions for coastal flood risk management

Tim Stojanovic, Elina Apine
People and Nature
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
article

Community acceptance of nature‐based solutions for coastal flood risk management

Tim Stojanovic, Elina Apine
article en

Abstract

Abstract Coastal areas are increasingly vulnerable to climate change impacts, such as rising sea levels and more frequent storm events, necessitating urgent adaptation strategies. Various adaptation approaches exist, including hard engineering solutions and nature‐based solutions, but whether these strategies are implemented often depends on social acceptance by local communities. Understanding the factors that influence community acceptance, such as trust, knowledge and perceived effectiveness, is vital for coastal risk management. This study employed a mixed methods approach across four diverse case study sites in the United Kingdom—St Andrews (Scotland), Airth (Scotland), Hesketh Bank (England) and Pensarn (Wales). We employed a postal survey and focus groups to gather both quantitative and qualitative data, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of local perceptions and values. A total of 328 valid responses were gathered across four sites, with variations in response rates and demographic characteristics, notably age and education. Awareness of Nature‐based Solutions (NbS) was low in Hesketh Bank, Pensarn and Airth, only respondents in St Andrews were more familiar with the term. Qualitative analysis identified 68 community and individual‐level factors, scheme characteristics and sociopolitical factors that influence social acceptance of coastal flood risk schemes. Participants emphasised the importance of local knowledge and landscape values but expressed low trust in government authorities and a lack of confidence in influencing local decisions. The study highlights the complexity of community acceptance of NbS for coastal flood risk management, indicating that local perceptions are influenced by a combination individual factors such as trust; the characteristics of schemes; and the ways in which governance systems interact with local communities. Context is also important with certain factors being site specific. Synthesis and applications . Community acceptance plays a crucial role in implementing coastal schemes, highlighting the importance of addressing the interests, values and experiences of local communities. Building trust and engaging stakeholders early in the planning stages to overcome potential push back due to uncertainties is critical. Collaborative and whole‐systems approaches are also essential to ensure that the benefits of NbS are effectively communicated and integrated. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and NatureVol. 8(1)
University of St Andrews (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.