Traumatic knee injury healthcare pathways and outcomes: the Australian Knee Injury Inception Cohort Study (KIICS) protocol

Decision-making for the optimal management of traumatic knee injuries can be challenging. Clinical trials reveal only small differences between surgical and non-surgical approaches, while patient and clinician biases, as well as healthcare access issues, may also influence management. Little is known about the real-world healthcare pathways for patients with a knee injury, as well as the person- and/or healthcare-related factors that influence management strategies and outcomes. The Australian Knee Injury Inception Cohort Study (KIICS) aims to: (1) describe healthcare pathways following acute knee injury (including the timing and type of healthcare consultations); (2) identify patient- and/or healthcare-related predictors of management strategy (ie, surgical vs non-surgical); and (3) examine the long-term outcome of different injury types, healthcare pathways and management strategies. KIICS is a nationwide prospective longitudinal inception cohort study recruiting Australians who have sustained an acute knee injury within the previous 6 months that disrupted daily activities or sports and led to a healthcare consultation. Participants will complete online questionnaires at enrolment and at 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post-injury. The data to be collected will include sociodemographic characteristics, knee injury history, the sequence of healthcare consultations and referral patterns, and management strategies (ie, surgical vs non-surgical). Patient-reported outcomes will include knee pain and instability, knee-related quality of life, patient-acceptable symptom state, health-related quality of life, mental health, fear of reinjury, return-to-sport status and activity level. Detailed statistical analysis plans will be developed to address the study's key research questions, informing clinical practice, shared decision-making and healthcare policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2025-002983
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traumatic knee injury healthcare pathways and outcomes: the Australian Knee Injury Inception Cohort Study (KIICS) protocol

M. Haberfield, Adam Geoffrey Culvenor, Michelle M. Dowsey, Joshua R Zadro et al.
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Traumatic knee injury healthcare pathways and outcomes: the Australian Knee Injury Inception Cohort Study (KIICS) protocol

M. Haberfield, Adam Geoffrey Culvenor, Michelle M. Dowsey, Joshua R Zadro, Brooke Patterson, Stephanie R. Filbay, Joanna Kvist, Ilana N. Ackerman, Kay M. Crossley, Marc-Olivier Dubé, Christian J. Barton, Evangelos Pappas, Andrea Maree Bruder, Sean Docking, Sean Kaplan, Tenille Moselen
article en

Abstract

Decision-making for the optimal management of traumatic knee injuries can be challenging. Clinical trials reveal only small differences between surgical and non-surgical approaches, while patient and clinician biases, as well as healthcare access issues, may also influence management. Little is known about the real-world healthcare pathways for patients with a knee injury, as well as the person- and/or healthcare-related factors that influence management strategies and outcomes. The Australian Knee Injury Inception Cohort Study (KIICS) aims to: (1) describe healthcare pathways following acute knee injury (including the timing and type of healthcare consultations); (2) identify patient- and/or healthcare-related predictors of management strategy (ie, surgical vs non-surgical); and (3) examine the long-term outcome of different injury types, healthcare pathways and management strategies. KIICS is a nationwide prospective longitudinal inception cohort study recruiting Australians who have sustained an acute knee injury within the previous 6 months that disrupted daily activities or sports and led to a healthcare consultation. Participants will complete online questionnaires at enrolment and at 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post-injury. The data to be collected will include sociodemographic characteristics, knee injury history, the sequence of healthcare consultations and referral patterns, and management strategies (ie, surgical vs non-surgical). Patient-reported outcomes will include knee pain and instability, knee-related quality of life, patient-acceptable symptom state, health-related quality of life, mental health, fear of reinjury, return-to-sport status and activity level. Detailed statistical analysis plans will be developed to address the study's key research questions, informing clinical practice, shared decision-making and healthcare policy.

BMJ Open Sport & Exercise MedicineVol. 11(4)
Linköping University (SE), The University of Sydney (AU), International Olympic Committee (CH), The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Institute for Musculoskeletal Health (AU), Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AU), Monash Health (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.