Three Dimensions of Care and Their Relationships With Caring, Inclusive, and Toxic Masculinity

ABSTRACT Are men becoming more caring? Is masculinity evolving to align with the ethics and principles of care? Drawing on literature on care work, the ethics of care, and the four principles of bioethics, we identify three dimensions of care: as work, as ethical frameworks emphasizing empathy and compassion, and as moral principles such as non‐maleficence (i.e., do no harm). We then examine how these dimensions intersect with shifts in masculinity and men's roles in caregiving. While earlier scholarship often depicted care as central to femininity and incompatible with masculinity, recent research on new fatherhood, caring masculinity, and inclusive masculinity suggests that some men are adopting more relational and empathetic identities. Simultaneously, the global rise of toxic masculinity represents a clear rejection of care. This article presents a nuanced view of the evolving relationship between masculinity and care and argues for multifaceted, contextual, and intersectional analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70035
Primary Topic
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three Dimensions of Care and Their Relationships With Caring, Inclusive, and Toxic Masculinity

Susanne Y. P. Choi, Alicia M. Barry
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
article

Three Dimensions of Care and Their Relationships With Caring, Inclusive, and Toxic Masculinity

Susanne Y. P. Choi, Alicia M. Barry
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Are men becoming more caring? Is masculinity evolving to align with the ethics and principles of care? Drawing on literature on care work, the ethics of care, and the four principles of bioethics, we identify three dimensions of care: as work, as ethical frameworks emphasizing empathy and compassion, and as moral principles such as non‐maleficence (i.e., do no harm). We then examine how these dimensions intersect with shifts in masculinity and men's roles in caregiving. While earlier scholarship often depicted care as central to femininity and incompatible with masculinity, recent research on new fatherhood, caring masculinity, and inclusive masculinity suggests that some men are adopting more relational and empathetic identities. Simultaneously, the global rise of toxic masculinity represents a clear rejection of care. This article presents a nuanced view of the evolving relationship between masculinity and care and argues for multifaceted, contextual, and intersectional analysis.

Journal of Family Theory & Review
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.