Mapping Charge Interactions in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are often rich in charged residues, and electrostatic interactions have a pronounced effect on their conformational distributions, interactions and functions. However, attaining quantitative understanding of electrostatics is challenging because of the sequence-specific arrangement of charges in the chain, the long-range nature of electrostatic interactions, charge screening, and the condensation of counterions-effects that all need to be taken into account self-consistently. Here, analytically tractable quantitative models are developed to predict ensemble average distances between any pair of residues in IDPs as a function of sequence and salt concentration, explicitly considering charge patterning. These models are tested systematically against extensive single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) data mapping intrachain distances for a range of charged IDPs with different sequence compositions, as a function of salt concentration, and with different labeling positions and fluorophores. The resulting polymer model with a minimal set of adjustable parameters accounts for counterion condensation, the resulting effective charges, as well as dipolar interactions, and can be used to predict detailed intrachain distance maps between all residues. Analytical models of this kind offer a valuable complement to simulations and can provide fundamental insight into the interactions underlying the conformational distributions of IDPs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Science
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202514056
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping Charge Interactions in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Andrea Soranno, Andrea Sottini, Natalie Mutter, Daniel Nettels et al.
Advanced Science
Protein Structure and Dynamics
article

Mapping Charge Interactions in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Andrea Soranno, Andrea Sottini, Natalie Mutter, Daniel Nettels, Michael Phillips, Benjamin Schuler, Magdalena Wojtas, Andrea Holla, Aritra Chowdhury, Jonathan Huihui, Andrzej Ożyhar, Kingshuk Ghosh, Sebastian König, Nick Lamb, Monika Lopko
article en

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are often rich in charged residues, and electrostatic interactions have a pronounced effect on their conformational distributions, interactions and functions. However, attaining quantitative understanding of electrostatics is challenging because of the sequence-specific arrangement of charges in the chain, the long-range nature of electrostatic interactions, charge screening, and the condensation of counterions-effects that all need to be taken into account self-consistently. Here, analytically tractable quantitative models are developed to predict ensemble average distances between any pair of residues in IDPs as a function of sequence and salt concentration, explicitly considering charge patterning. These models are tested systematically against extensive single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) data mapping intrachain distances for a range of charged IDPs with different sequence compositions, as a function of salt concentration, and with different labeling positions and fluorophores. The resulting polymer model with a minimal set of adjustable parameters accounts for counterion condensation, the resulting effective charges, as well as dipolar interactions, and can be used to predict detailed intrachain distance maps between all residues. Analytical models of this kind offer a valuable complement to simulations and can provide fundamental insight into the interactions underlying the conformational distributions of IDPs.

Advanced ScienceVol. 13(16)
University of Denver (US), University of Zurich (CH), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH), Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.