How well do machine learning models in finance work?

Abstract We examine how machine learning models predict stock returns in the Korean market. By analyzing various firm characteristics and macroeconomic variables, we find that tree-based models outperform other machine learning approaches. This finding suggests that, in data-constrained contexts, moderately complex models outperform advanced methods that require extensive datasets. Using PFI, SHAP, and LIME, we consistently identify the 36-month momentum as the key predictor. PDP, ICE, and ALE analyses reveal threshold effects of 36-month momentum that diminish at higher return levels. Our findings underscore the value of ensemble-based methods in settings characterized by short data histories and heightened volatility. This study illustrates how multimethod interpretability can yield deeper economic insights, ultimately guiding more effective investment strategies and policy decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Innovation
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-025-00870-0
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How well do machine learning models in finance work?

Yeonchan Kang, Doojin Ryu, Robert I. Webb
3 citations
Financial Innovation
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
6.32
article

How well do machine learning models in finance work?

Yeonchan Kang, Doojin Ryu, Robert I. Webb
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We examine how machine learning models predict stock returns in the Korean market. By analyzing various firm characteristics and macroeconomic variables, we find that tree-based models outperform other machine learning approaches. This finding suggests that, in data-constrained contexts, moderately complex models outperform advanced methods that require extensive datasets. Using PFI, SHAP, and LIME, we consistently identify the 36-month momentum as the key predictor. PDP, ICE, and ALE analyses reveal threshold effects of 36-month momentum that diminish at higher return levels. Our findings underscore the value of ensemble-based methods in settings characterized by short data histories and heightened volatility. This study illustrates how multimethod interpretability can yield deeper economic insights, ultimately guiding more effective investment strategies and policy decisions.

Financial InnovationVol. 11(1)
University of Virginia (US), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Education, India, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
6.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.