Three ethical approaches to expanding newborn screening through genomics: a critical comparative analysis

While rigorous evidence-gathering to inform the ethical and societal impacts of gNBS is critical, this must be accompanied by - and interpreted through - normative ethical analysis that clearly articulates the values and tensions at stake. Overall, ethical implementation of gNBS requires a policy approach that (i) adopts public health ethics for programme design, (ii) operationalises select human-rights claims in accordance with established screening principles, and (iii) embeds liberal protections against state or parental overreach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01331-0
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three ethical approaches to expanding newborn screening through genomics: a critical comparative analysis

Margaret Otlowski, Robin Banks, Gabriel Watts, Ainsley J. Newson
BMC Medical Ethics
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Three ethical approaches to expanding newborn screening through genomics: a critical comparative analysis

Margaret Otlowski, Robin Banks, Gabriel Watts, Ainsley J. Newson
article en

Abstract

While rigorous evidence-gathering to inform the ethical and societal impacts of gNBS is critical, this must be accompanied by - and interpreted through - normative ethical analysis that clearly articulates the values and tensions at stake. Overall, ethical implementation of gNBS requires a policy approach that (i) adopts public health ethics for programme design, (ii) operationalises select human-rights claims in accordance with established screening principles, and (iii) embeds liberal protections against state or parental overreach.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 26(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Sydney Local Health District (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.