Deconstructing value in solar panel reuse with time-explicit life cycle assessment and costing

Many solar panels are discarded before the end of their technical lifespan, wasting valuable energy generation potential. Reusing these panels in underserved communities expands clean energy access but incurs upfront processing costs and yields energy later, at diminishing capacity. To justify such value retention efforts, the temporal dimension is essential yet underexplored. This study uses Time-Explicit Life Cycle Assessment and Costing to investigate when, which values were retained, and at which cost, across three solar panel reuse cases in the Netherlands. Results show life cycle Carbon Footprints savings of up to 231,700kgCO 2-eq and financial savings up to €307,935. However, during reuse processing years, Carbon Footprints rise by 37 %, and upfront costs rise by up to 90 %. Cost bearers and beneficiaries differ. Nevertheless, these additional impacts balance out in 2–3 years. Reuse emerges as a promising circular strategy, provided financing and policy mechanisms will be in place to address upfront costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108699
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deconstructing value in solar panel reuse with time-explicit life cycle assessment and costing

Tomer Fishman, Arnold Tukker, Mingming Hu, Droovi Beven Keanu de Zilva
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Deconstructing value in solar panel reuse with time-explicit life cycle assessment and costing

Tomer Fishman, Arnold Tukker, Mingming Hu, Droovi Beven Keanu de Zilva
article en

Abstract

Many solar panels are discarded before the end of their technical lifespan, wasting valuable energy generation potential. Reusing these panels in underserved communities expands clean energy access but incurs upfront processing costs and yields energy later, at diminishing capacity. To justify such value retention efforts, the temporal dimension is essential yet underexplored. This study uses Time-Explicit Life Cycle Assessment and Costing to investigate when, which values were retained, and at which cost, across three solar panel reuse cases in the Netherlands. Results show life cycle Carbon Footprints savings of up to 231,700kgCO 2-eq and financial savings up to €307,935. However, during reuse processing years, Carbon Footprints rise by 37 %, and upfront costs rise by up to 90 %. Cost bearers and beneficiaries differ. Nevertheless, these additional impacts balance out in 2–3 years. Reuse emerges as a promising circular strategy, provided financing and policy mechanisms will be in place to address upfront costs.

Resources Conservation and RecyclingVol. 226
Leiden University (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.