Mechanistic and comparative laboratory assessment of lime dosage and uniaxial geogrid on the strength and durability of classified lateritic subgrade

This study presents a mechanistic and comparative laboratory assessment of lime stabilization and uniaxial geogrid reinforcement, applied independently and in combination, to improve the engineering performance of a classified A-7-6 (CL–ML) lateritic subgrade from Ogun State, Nigeria. The objective was to evaluate the effect of lime dosage and geogrid inclusion on the short- and long-term California Bearing Ratio (CBR), Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS), and Resilient Modulus (MR), and to test the hypothesis that chemical and mechanical stabilization mechanisms act synergistically to enhance stiffness and durability. Quicklime (CaO > 90%) was added at 2–8% by dry weight, while the geogrid used was uniaxial polypropylene with an aperture size of 30 mm and tensile strength of 22 kN/m. Specimens were prepared by mixing, compacting, and curing at 25 ± 2 °C and 95 ± 2% RH for 7, 14, and 28 days, then tested according to ASTM and AASHTO standards. Each condition was replicated thrice, and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results showed that lime treatment reduced the plasticity index from 30 ± 1.2 to 6 ± 0.5%, increased UCS from 300 ± 15 to 950 ± 40 kPa and improved soaked CBR from 23 ± 1.1 to 57.5 ± 2.3% after 28 days. Single and double geogrid layers enhanced soaked CBR to 33 ± 1.4% and 43 ± 1.7%, respectively, with negligible strength loss after three moisture cycles, confirming durability under wetting–drying conditions. Combined lime–geogrid stabilization achieved the highest performance, with CBR > 65%, MR > 90 MPa, and UCS > 1.0 MPa, exceeding AASHTO subgrade requirements. The findings demonstrate that lime primarily enhances chemical bonding, whereas geogrid reinforcement improves mechanical confinement; their combination offers a durable, cost-effective, and low-carbon alternative to conventional cement stabilization for tropical lateritic subgrades.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30041-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanistic and comparative laboratory assessment of lime dosage and uniaxial geogrid on the strength and durability of classified lateritic subgrade

A. C. Apata, Majid Movahedi Rad, Udeme Udo Imoh, Abdulazeez Muritala Bolorunduro
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
article

Mechanistic and comparative laboratory assessment of lime dosage and uniaxial geogrid on the strength and durability of classified lateritic subgrade

A. C. Apata, Majid Movahedi Rad, Udeme Udo Imoh, Abdulazeez Muritala Bolorunduro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study presents a mechanistic and comparative laboratory assessment of lime stabilization and uniaxial geogrid reinforcement, applied independently and in combination, to improve the engineering performance of a classified A-7-6 (CL–ML) lateritic subgrade from Ogun State, Nigeria. The objective was to evaluate the effect of lime dosage and geogrid inclusion on the short- and long-term California Bearing Ratio (CBR), Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS), and Resilient Modulus (MR), and to test the hypothesis that chemical and mechanical stabilization mechanisms act synergistically to enhance stiffness and durability. Quicklime (CaO > 90%) was added at 2–8% by dry weight, while the geogrid used was uniaxial polypropylene with an aperture size of 30 mm and tensile strength of 22 kN/m. Specimens were prepared by mixing, compacting, and curing at 25 ± 2 °C and 95 ± 2% RH for 7, 14, and 28 days, then tested according to ASTM and AASHTO standards. Each condition was replicated thrice, and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results showed that lime treatment reduced the plasticity index from 30 ± 1.2 to 6 ± 0.5%, increased UCS from 300 ± 15 to 950 ± 40 kPa and improved soaked CBR from 23 ± 1.1 to 57.5 ± 2.3% after 28 days. Single and double geogrid layers enhanced soaked CBR to 33 ± 1.4% and 43 ± 1.7%, respectively, with negligible strength loss after three moisture cycles, confirming durability under wetting–drying conditions. Combined lime–geogrid stabilization achieved the highest performance, with CBR > 65%, MR > 90 MPa, and UCS > 1.0 MPa, exceeding AASHTO subgrade requirements. The findings demonstrate that lime primarily enhances chemical bonding, whereas geogrid reinforcement improves mechanical confinement; their combination offers a durable, cost-effective, and low-carbon alternative to conventional cement stabilization for tropical lateritic subgrades.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Lagos (NG), Széchenyi István University (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.