Evaluation of Biochar and Iron as Alternative Materials to Improve Performance of Septic Systems—Part 1. Material Selection and Batch Tests

The benefits of incorporating biochar and iron as alternative materials to improve septic effluent quality were assessed and compared to C33 sand, a traditional material used to construct septic system soil treatment areas. This study used sequential batch tests to investigate pollution reduction performance of C33 sand, eight types of biochar, and three types of iron with various dosages to identify and optimize operational parameters. Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics models were used to simulate temporal performance of wastewater treatment and identify likely mechanisms driving improvements in septic effluent quality. Softwood pine (SP) biochar was most effective at reducing biological oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN), and fecal coliform (FC) in septic effluent, while treatment with iron-enhanced-sand (IES) produced the highest removal efficiency for total suspended solids (TSS) (> 80%) and total phosphorus (TP) (> 95%) among substrates tested. Experimentation revealed dosages that achieved optimal pollutant removal from 50-mL septic effluent were 5-g C33 sand, 1-g SP, or 2-g IES. Kinetics study showed that the pseudo-second-order model generally described the adsorption performance better than the pseudo-first-order model regardless of materials (average R<sup>2</sup> value > 0.95). Furthermore, the pseudo-second-order model simulated adsorption capability (mg g<sup>-1</sup>) at equilibrium status with a lower percent error when compared to the pseudo-first-order model results. Based on these results, incorporation of SP and IES as alternative materials can achieve higher contaminant removal efficiency and produce cleaner septic effluent, thereby benefiting the environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Environment Research
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.70207
Primary Topic
Phosphorus and nutrient management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Biochar and Iron as Alternative Materials to Improve Performance of Septic Systems—Part 1. Material Selection and Batch Tests

Sara Heger, D. Albrey Arrington, Bo Hu, Chia‐Yang Chen
Water Environment Research
Phosphorus and nutrient management
article

Evaluation of Biochar and Iron as Alternative Materials to Improve Performance of Septic Systems—Part 1. Material Selection and Batch Tests

Sara Heger, D. Albrey Arrington, Bo Hu, Chia‐Yang Chen
article en

Abstract

The benefits of incorporating biochar and iron as alternative materials to improve septic effluent quality were assessed and compared to C33 sand, a traditional material used to construct septic system soil treatment areas. This study used sequential batch tests to investigate pollution reduction performance of C33 sand, eight types of biochar, and three types of iron with various dosages to identify and optimize operational parameters. Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics models were used to simulate temporal performance of wastewater treatment and identify likely mechanisms driving improvements in septic effluent quality. Softwood pine (SP) biochar was most effective at reducing biological oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN), and fecal coliform (FC) in septic effluent, while treatment with iron-enhanced-sand (IES) produced the highest removal efficiency for total suspended solids (TSS) (> 80%) and total phosphorus (TP) (> 95%) among substrates tested. Experimentation revealed dosages that achieved optimal pollutant removal from 50-mL septic effluent were 5-g C33 sand, 1-g SP, or 2-g IES. Kinetics study showed that the pseudo-second-order model generally described the adsorption performance better than the pseudo-first-order model regardless of materials (average R<sup>2</sup> value > 0.95). Furthermore, the pseudo-second-order model simulated adsorption capability (mg g<sup>-1</sup>) at equilibrium status with a lower percent error when compared to the pseudo-first-order model results. Based on these results, incorporation of SP and IES as alternative materials can achieve higher contaminant removal efficiency and produce cleaner septic effluent, thereby benefiting the environment.

Water Environment ResearchVol. 97(12)
University of Minnesota (US), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (US), Jupiter Medical Center (US), Jupiter (United States) (US)
University of Minnesota
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Phosphorus and nutrient management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.