Body Measurements for Digital Forensic Comparison of Individuals—An Overview of Current Developments

Forensic identification of individuals faces significant challenges, particularly when conventional biometric features such as the face are hidden. This paper examines the historical development and revival of body patterns (anthropometric rig) as biometric comparison feature, from historical Bertillonage to modern, computer-assisted methods such as digital anthropometric rig matching and the connection to 3D human pose estimation (HPE). It highlights both the mathematical and methodological foundations of this revival, as well as the potential and limitations of applying artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of digital anthropometric rig matching. The aim is to highlight the development of potential and challenges for the forensic validity of the person-specific digital skeleton. This clearly shows the time required for manual work, which underlines the need for automation. The time required can be reduced by approaches that use AI. However, these methods are often not yet up to the requirements in a forensic context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312518
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Body Measurements for Digital Forensic Comparison of Individuals—An Overview of Current Developments

Dirk Labudde, Sergio Richter
Applied Sciences
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Body Measurements for Digital Forensic Comparison of Individuals—An Overview of Current Developments

Dirk Labudde, Sergio Richter
article en

Abstract

Forensic identification of individuals faces significant challenges, particularly when conventional biometric features such as the face are hidden. This paper examines the historical development and revival of body patterns (anthropometric rig) as biometric comparison feature, from historical Bertillonage to modern, computer-assisted methods such as digital anthropometric rig matching and the connection to 3D human pose estimation (HPE). It highlights both the mathematical and methodological foundations of this revival, as well as the potential and limitations of applying artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of digital anthropometric rig matching. The aim is to highlight the development of potential and challenges for the forensic validity of the person-specific digital skeleton. This clearly shows the time required for manual work, which underlines the need for automation. The time required can be reduced by approaches that use AI. However, these methods are often not yet up to the requirements in a forensic context.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(23)
Hochschule Mittweida (DE), Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.