A benchmarking approach to lean quality practices: developing a strategic roadmap for port efficiency

Purpose This study demonstrates how lean tools and total quality management (TQM) methodologies can improve operational efficiency and competitiveness in port operations. Design/methodology/approach Data from three ports (United States, Costa Rica and Spain) were gathered via field observations, focus group discussions and interviews. Key processes analyzed were crane operations, yard management and gate inbound/outbound operations. Lean tools applied included fishbone analysis, value stream mapping (VSM), overall equipment effectiveness (OEE), DMAIC, bottleneck analysis, Kanban, 5S and quality function deployment (QFD). A benchmarking map was created to compare performance and guide lean implementation. Findings The US port achieved the highest level of operational efficiency through comprehensive lean tool adoption and training. Costa Rica excelled in yard operations but lagged elsewhere due to limited lean practice use. Spain actively used lean tools, but isolated application reduced their effectiveness. Research limitations/implications This study provides valuable insights into applying lean tools in port operations, but has notable limitations. It examined only three ports in different countries, each with unique regulatory and cultural contexts, limiting the generalizability of findings. The reliance on qualitative data offers rich detail but may introduce bias and lacks quantitative performance metrics. Confidentiality agreements also restricted disclosure of operational details, reducing comparative depth. Future research should expand the sample size to include more geographically and operationally diverse ports. Incorporating larger datasets and varied case studies would strengthen benchmarking frameworks. Practical implications This paper demonstrates how various lean tools help ports align with strategic objectives and foster continuous improvement. The benchmarking map provides a visual guide for implementing or refining lean practices. Originality/value This study provides practical insights into the application of lean and TQM tools in port environments and offers a structured benchmarking framework to support performance improvement across diverse operational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Benchmarking An International Journal
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-12-2024-1092
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maritime Ports and Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A benchmarking approach to lean quality practices: developing a strategic roadmap for port efficiency

Marvin E. González, Gioconda Quesada, K N Gourdin, Rene Dentiste Mueller
1 citations
Benchmarking An International Journal
Maritime Ports and Logistics
1.24
article

A benchmarking approach to lean quality practices: developing a strategic roadmap for port efficiency

Marvin E. González, Gioconda Quesada, K N Gourdin, Rene Dentiste Mueller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study demonstrates how lean tools and total quality management (TQM) methodologies can improve operational efficiency and competitiveness in port operations. Design/methodology/approach Data from three ports (United States, Costa Rica and Spain) were gathered via field observations, focus group discussions and interviews. Key processes analyzed were crane operations, yard management and gate inbound/outbound operations. Lean tools applied included fishbone analysis, value stream mapping (VSM), overall equipment effectiveness (OEE), DMAIC, bottleneck analysis, Kanban, 5S and quality function deployment (QFD). A benchmarking map was created to compare performance and guide lean implementation. Findings The US port achieved the highest level of operational efficiency through comprehensive lean tool adoption and training. Costa Rica excelled in yard operations but lagged elsewhere due to limited lean practice use. Spain actively used lean tools, but isolated application reduced their effectiveness. Research limitations/implications This study provides valuable insights into applying lean tools in port operations, but has notable limitations. It examined only three ports in different countries, each with unique regulatory and cultural contexts, limiting the generalizability of findings. The reliance on qualitative data offers rich detail but may introduce bias and lacks quantitative performance metrics. Confidentiality agreements also restricted disclosure of operational details, reducing comparative depth. Future research should expand the sample size to include more geographically and operationally diverse ports. Incorporating larger datasets and varied case studies would strengthen benchmarking frameworks. Practical implications This paper demonstrates how various lean tools help ports align with strategic objectives and foster continuous improvement. The benchmarking map provides a visual guide for implementing or refining lean practices. Originality/value This study provides practical insights into the application of lean and TQM tools in port environments and offers a structured benchmarking framework to support performance improvement across diverse operational contexts.

Benchmarking An International Journal
College of Charleston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Maritime Ports and Logistics
1.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.