Validating Open Cluster Candidates with Photometric Bayesian Evidence

Abstract The thousands of open cluster (OC) candidates identified by the Gaia mission are significantly contaminated by false positives from field star fluctuations, posing a major validation challenge. Based on the Mixture Model for OCs, we present a Bayesian framework for validating OC candidates in the color–magnitude diagram. The method compares the Bayesian evidence of two competing models: a single stellar population with field contamination versus a pure field population. Their ratio, the Bayes factor (BF), quantifies the statistical support for cluster existence. Tests on confirmed clusters and random fields show that a threshold of BF > 100 effectively distinguishes genuine clusters from chance field overdensities. This approach provides a robust, quantitative tool for OC validation and catalog refinement. The framework is extendable to multidimensional validation, incorporating kinematics, and is broadly applicable to other resolved stellar systems, including candidate moving groups, stellar streams, and dwarf satellites.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae17ce
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating Open Cluster Candidates with Photometric Bayesian Evidence

Zhengyi Shao, Zhaozhou Li, Lu Li
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
article

Validating Open Cluster Candidates with Photometric Bayesian Evidence

Zhengyi Shao, Zhaozhou Li, Lu Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract The thousands of open cluster (OC) candidates identified by the Gaia mission are significantly contaminated by false positives from field star fluctuations, posing a major validation challenge. Based on the Mixture Model for OCs, we present a Bayesian framework for validating OC candidates in the color–magnitude diagram. The method compares the Bayesian evidence of two competing models: a single stellar population with field contamination versus a pure field population. Their ratio, the Bayes factor (BF), quantifies the statistical support for cluster existence. Tests on confirmed clusters and random fields show that a threshold of BF > 100 effectively distinguishes genuine clusters from chance field overdensities. This approach provides a robust, quantitative tool for OC validation and catalog refinement. The framework is extendable to multidimensional validation, incorporating kinematics, and is broadly applicable to other resolved stellar systems, including candidate moving groups, stellar streams, and dwarf satellites.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 994(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Validating Open Cluster Candidates with Photometric Bayesian Evidence — Zhengyi Shao, Zhaozhou Li, et al. · The Astrophysical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS