Is ChatGPT a good study companion? The role of AI-generated summaries and reflective prompts in learning from educational videos

Online videos have become a central tool in modern education. Alongside this shift, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping personalized learning experiences, with generative large language models like ChatGPT offering new ways to tailor information to individual learners. Based on the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML), which proposes two principles that relate to the interaction with the learning material (segmenting and generative activity), we conducted two experiments in which participants were asked to pause an educational video at times of comprehension difficulty. In Experiment 1 ( N = 101), we examined whether GPT-generated summaries -introduced at self-paced pause points-result in better learning compared to video transcripts. In Experiment 2 ( N = 215), we compared the role of GPT-generated summaries and GPT-generated reflective prompts. Those elicited open-ended answers from the participants. We measured retention and transfer learning, as well as mental effort, and perceived task difficulty. Contrary to our expectations, we observed no differences between AI summaries and transcripts in terms of retention and transfer outcomes. Participants showed a learning effect indicating more correct answers after watching the video, but this effect did not differ between conditions. We can especially note that the motivation to engage in the material, as well as the difficulty and length of the video, may have affected the results. As research investigating the role of AI in educational settings is still new, future research can delve into finding the optimal conditions under which AI can benefit learning outcomes. • Learning videos can benefit from AI tools that promote individualized feedback. • We examined the role of information type (summaries vs. transcripts or questions). • We provided AI (ChatGPT)-generated information at self-paced pause points. • No difference was found between conditions on retention and transfer outcomes. • Increasing AI interactivity in future work can improve motivation and learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100512
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is ChatGPT a good study companion? The role of AI-generated summaries and reflective prompts in learning from educational videos

Ayşe Candan Şimşek, Markus Huff, Gerrit Anders, Luisa Specht et al.
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Is ChatGPT a good study companion? The role of AI-generated summaries and reflective prompts in learning from educational videos

Ayşe Candan Şimşek, Markus Huff, Gerrit Anders, Luisa Specht, Jonathan Göth
article en

Abstract

Online videos have become a central tool in modern education. Alongside this shift, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping personalized learning experiences, with generative large language models like ChatGPT offering new ways to tailor information to individual learners. Based on the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML), which proposes two principles that relate to the interaction with the learning material (segmenting and generative activity), we conducted two experiments in which participants were asked to pause an educational video at times of comprehension difficulty. In Experiment 1 ( N = 101), we examined whether GPT-generated summaries -introduced at self-paced pause points-result in better learning compared to video transcripts. In Experiment 2 ( N = 215), we compared the role of GPT-generated summaries and GPT-generated reflective prompts. Those elicited open-ended answers from the participants. We measured retention and transfer learning, as well as mental effort, and perceived task difficulty. Contrary to our expectations, we observed no differences between AI summaries and transcripts in terms of retention and transfer outcomes. Participants showed a learning effect indicating more correct answers after watching the video, but this effect did not differ between conditions. We can especially note that the motivation to engage in the material, as well as the difficulty and length of the video, may have affected the results. As research investigating the role of AI in educational settings is still new, future research can delve into finding the optimal conditions under which AI can benefit learning outcomes. • Learning videos can benefit from AI tools that promote individualized feedback. • We examined the role of information type (summaries vs. transcripts or questions). • We provided AI (ChatGPT)-generated information at self-paced pause points. • No difference was found between conditions on retention and transfer outcomes. • Increasing AI interactivity in future work can improve motivation and learning.

Computers and Education Artificial IntelligenceVol. 9
Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.